So I'm confused... I thought the Big 10 was the best conference... yet they keep getting beaten by ACC teams... Did I miss something?

The B1G is still the best top to bottom. Their lower tier teams are playing teams from other conferences that are much higher in their standings and hanging with them. The top two or three ACC teams have talent to pull off big plays, beat anyone, and they're certainly well rested. They just lack guts when they schedule their regular season games. If your conference averages 13.3 games per year against FCS, nobody should take you seriously. Clemson destroyed tOSU and FSU beat (a badly banged up) Michigan; give them credit. But why do they play teams like Murray St, Savannah St, Furman, Mercer, Ga Southern, Elon, Troy, Citadel., Maine, Delaware.......?

Next season the top three ACC teams have at least one FCS school and one or two bottom feeders from FBS

They really need to just have the B1G, PAC, SEC, and probably ACC expand and their champions (and only their champion) play off. Put Oklahoma, Ok St, Texas, and someone else into the B1G. ND, Houston, TCU, K St, Baylor, and a few more into the ACC & SEC. Boise and BYU to the PAC

did someone claim the Big Ten was the best conference? usually that's the SEC or ACC. though, the Big Ten has the most top ten ranked teams all season long, compared too the SEC or ACC this year. but of course, the championship or bowl wins are what matters more.

maybe next year. go Bucks!

Well then what is the best conference in college football? Cause it sure as hell ain't the SEC. There's Bama, and a whole bunch of irrelevant and/or underachieving teams this season.

Michigan is still damaged by their loss to Ohio State. Ohio State wasn't even competitive today vs. Clemson, I don't know what the hell their problem was. Maryland, Indiana, and Nebraska aren't very good.

Dint know