Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Sanctuary cities protect illegal citizens of other countries then why?

Why can a city refuse federal law, yet a citizen do the same and its considered aiding and abetting a fugitive of the law. Punishable by fines and jail time. If democrats refuse to follow law what keeps 2nd amendment laws from being refused as protest in States like California where they disregard republican voters. A bigger question is how would democrats deal with republican voters disregarding their anti-right laws if they were armed with fully auto weapons? As its a federal law to not have that what's the difference in refusing one federal law compared to the other. In your opinion what would they do and how would they deal with military grade armed citizens? Would it get spotlight or be covered up? Please provide a thought on the matters in a detail manner without insulting.

4 Answers

Relevance
  • 4 years ago

    The administrators of those cities should be prosecuted for obstructing the law.

  • Ken S
    Lv 7
    4 years ago

    There is a difference between refusing to follow a law and not helping in the enforcement of a law

  • ?
    Lv 6
    4 years ago

    Don't be led my morons

  • 4 years ago

    Liberals tend to only obey the laws that they agree with and that lets them do whatever they want. Conservatives follow all laws and only disobey when pushed. Liberals are the ones wanting fully automatic weapons, since they can be used in a crowd creating more victims for them to exploit. Conservatives prefer to have guns that will scatter your brains after a round goes through you over 100 yards.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.