Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
13 Answers
- Philip HLv 74 years ago
The only person "nailed" to a cross, as far as has been reported, was Jesus. Normally the Romans tied them to their torture device and left them there to die a very slow and painful death. It could literally take a couple of days and hanging like that made breathing Very difficult.
- Anonymous4 years ago
The nails were long cut nails of iron that were very brittle! Cut nails snap very easy if grasped with pliers and bent suddenly and there were tools of that sort handy here is an actual crucifiction nail break off the head and now you take down the body .
- choko_canyonLv 74 years ago
With large, cast-iron pliers. How else? Those nails were hard to make, dude. They weren't going to just leave them there.
- Anonymous4 years ago
the only took down failed Jewish messiahs
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- Anonymous4 years ago
Pliers?
- jon pikeLv 74 years ago
Nails were expensive and an effort was made to reclaim them. When nails were involved, they were long and square (about 15cm long and 1cm thick) and were driven into the victim's wrists or forearms to fix him to the crossbar.
Once the crossbar was in place, the feet may be nailed to either side of the upright or crossed. In the first case, nails would have been driven through the heel bones, and in the second case, one nail would have been hammered through the metatarsals in the middle of the foot.
Seneca, the Roman philosopher, wrote in 40AD that the process of crucifying someone varied greatly: "I see crosses there, not just of one kind but made in different ways: some have their victims with their head down to the ground, some impale their private parts, others stretch out their arms."
To remove and reuse the nails, the Roman detail either bent the nails back or just tore the flesh from the nail. The exception was the nail through the feet, which often was driven through the ankle bone and difficult to remove. So, the foot was hacked off and the nail may have been left in the bone.
Source(s): www.forbes.com, 12/8/15 - Dr. DLv 74 years ago
Why bother to remove the nails. There are bones of people who died from crucifixion and the nails are not removed. http://cdn.timesofisrael.com/uploads/2012/03/Heel-...
- jpopelishLv 74 years ago
The Romans left dead people on the cross,
until they were picked apart by scavengers.
They were up there, on display,
to discourage anyone else
from resisting the Roman occupation.
--
Regards,
John Popelish
- El Nerdo LocoLv 74 years ago
Typically, they were just mummies or skeletons by then. Crucifixion wasn't meant just to be an execution, but a humiliation. Part of making an example of people was leaving them up there to be fed on by ravens and rot.
The nails come out pretty easy after that.