Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Jon
Lv 5
Jon asked in Politics & GovernmentPolitics · 4 years ago

Why didn't people who are for the 2nd Amendment the way the NRA interprets it get angry when California passed the Mulford Act?

Update:

The Mulford Act was a 1967 California bill that repealed a law allowing public carrying of loaded firearms. Named after Republican assemblyman Don Mulford, the bill was crafted in response to members of the Black Panther Party who were conducting armed patrols of Oakland neighborhoods while they were conducting what would later be termed copwatching. They garnered national attention after the Black Panthers marched bearing arms upon the California State Capitol to protest the bill.

Update 2:

Both Republicans and Democrats in California supported increased gun control. Governor Ronald Reagan was present when the protesters arrived and later commented that he saw "no reason why on the street today a citizen should be carrying loaded weapons" and that guns were a "ridiculous way to solve problems that have to be solved among people of good will." In a later press conference, Reagan added that the Mulford Act "would work no hardship on the honest citizen."

Update 3:

The bill was signed by Reagan and became California penal code 25850 and 171c https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mulford_Act

5 Answers

Relevance
  • 4 years ago

    Because crap like that is to be expected in California. If California passed a law FOR gun owners I would probably die from shock.

  • 4 years ago

    The NRA doesn't give a crap about the 2nd Ammendment. They use it to get money. Lots and lots and lots of it.

  • Anonymous
    4 years ago

    What the hell is it you don't understand about "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed"?

  • Anonymous
    4 years ago

    Because I was a kid.

    Why are you this stupid today?

    BTW, the NRA interprets the 2A the way it was written.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 4 years ago

    They did. The rest of the state was in an uproar about having their Constitutional rights stolen because hysterical lefties in the big cities were scared of black people with guns.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.