Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Samuel asked in SportsFootball (American) · 3 years ago

Which Eagles team was better overall and why? Was it the 2017 Eagles w/healthy Wentz or the 2004 Eagles who Lost in the super bowl?

What is ur thoughts

7 Answers

Relevance
  • Cu Tie
    Lv 7
    3 years ago

    I will go with the 2017 Eagles. However, I believe that the 2001 Eagles were a better balanced team than both. I have always said that if the Eagles had just beat the Rams in the NFC Championship Game, they would have defeated the Patriots in Super Bowl XXXVI.

  • 3 years ago

    2004

  • David
    Lv 7
    3 years ago

    2017, in my opinion.

  • 3 years ago

    This team is an actual team. 2004 had to many individual players, like TO and McNabb, who were self promoting all of the time.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • y
    Lv 7
    3 years ago

    Debatable, the game has also changed which makes direct comparisons even more difficult. The teams, the league now, I do not believe is as good as back then. The pats team they are playing is not nearly as good as the 04 team. So even if they win, you can't really compare. That 04 eagles team, went to 4 straight conference championship games, so I would actually give them the edge.

  • 3 years ago

    2017 - close with both being Super Bowl teams, but Wentz and depth make the difference. The 2004 Eagles wouldn't have made it through the playoffs with a backup QB.

  • Anonymous
    3 years ago

    2017 Eagles cause they will win the Super Bowl

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.