Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

For the love of God?

Should everyone just have a food fight and end this who bakes cakes for who once and for all?

7 Answers

Relevance
  • ?
    Lv 7
    3 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    Eh, so the Purge, but it is just legal to throw pudding?

  • ?
    Lv 7
    3 years ago

    It would take a lot more than that . It would take that Servant of Isaiah 52 to be marred more than even the Son of man .

  • ?
    Lv 5
    3 years ago

    That case brought out the best views I've heard in 20years.

    was intended to cause fear and to terrorize a population.”

    Today, Thomas’s scathing concurrence in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission(pdf) recalls that case.

    Thomas reminds his colleagues that the Supreme Court has been pretty tolerant of intolerance in the past, when it was against African-Americans, despite their robust defense of gay rights and their concern for the “dignity” of homosexuals in the cakeshop case. If cross-burning is debated as free speech worthy of constitutional protection, he reasons, surely refusing to bake a cake for a same-sex wedding is too.

    The court’s only African-American justice is sharply critical of past rulings that allowed “racist, demeaning and even threatening” speech and conduct towards blacks under the guise of First Amendment protections. He argues that Jack Phillips’ refusal to bake for a gay marriage in 2012 was, by comparison, very mild and well within the territory of protected speech, writing:

    Concerns about “dignity” and “stigma” did not carry the day when this Court affirmed the right of white supremacists to burn a 25-foot cross [in] Virginia v. Black; conduct a rally on Martin Luther King Jr.’s birthday [in] Forsyth County v. Nationalist Movement; or circulate a film featur­ing hooded Klan members who were brandishing weapons and threatening to “‘Bury the niggers,’” [in] Brandenburg v. Ohio.

    Thomas also points out that the most offensive notions are actually those that demand the most constitutional protection. After all, it’s no big deal to protect speech that everyone agrees is fine and ideas that most people support. But the law is there to ensure that unpopular opinions can be expressed, he argues, especially if they’re fundamentally distasteful to many.

  • Part of me wants this to happen, yet another part is saddened at all the potentially wasted cake

    Well, it's not wasted if it's not eaten 😁

    ⒷⓉⓂ ③

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Anonymous
    3 years ago

    No, now be quiet and make me a cake dad-blast-it.

  • Smurf
    Lv 7
    3 years ago

    Yes

  • 3 years ago

    Would be brilliant! I'm in! Especially if I can eat all the cake leftovers afterward... Nom, cake! :D :D :D

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.