Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Electron Configuration Exceptions?

I am taking chem.12 and I have a test in a couple days, and one of the topics is electron configurations including cations and anions.

It is all pretty straight forward, but she told me that there were 6 or 7 exceptions to the rule that I should be aware of.

So fare I only know of 5;

-Chromium and molybdenum

-Copper, Silver, and Gold

Which other ones am I missing? I could not find anything in my textbook, nor online

2 Answers

Relevance
  • 3 years ago

    Electron configurations.....

    There are indeed several elements whose electron configurations don't agree with what the Aufbau principle suggests. But a deeper issue is that the Aufbau principle itself is not all its cracked up to be. It is a model based on the (n+ℓ) rule, and it works everywhere, except where it doesn't, and that turns out to be for quite a few elements. There are many elements for which the electron configurations according to the Aufbau principle are just plain wrong.

    ........ [ I know this goes beyond your original question, but the "exceptions" don't mean much if what they are the exceptions of is wrong. ]

    The beginning of the problems lie along the first-row transition metals where the convention is to write the 4s sublevel and then the 3d sublevel, when if fact, the 4s should be last in the sequence. The 4s sublevel is ALWAYS higher in energy than the 3d and should be written last in the electron configuration. Yet there are many out-of-date textbooks and many teachers' dusty old notes which give the 4s sublevel followed by the 3d. That is incorrect.

    You may have heard some teachers stammering around saying that the 4s is lower in energy than the 3d, and then have to hand-wave some nonsense as to why the electrons are first lost from the 4s sublevel. The electrons are lost from the 4s because they are the highest in energy and the most easy to remove, AND the 4s electrons are written last in the electron configuration of the first row transition metals.

    The problem lies with K and Ca and the fact that electrons are found in the 4s sublevel. That's because the 4s for Z=19 and Z=20 is lower than the unoccupied 3d orbitals. But at Z=21 (Sc) the energy of the 3d is less than the 4s and the electrons are found in the 3d before the 4s. (Yes, the atomic number is a factor in this discussion.)

    K..... [Ar] 4s1

    Ca... [Ar] 4s2

    Sc .. [Ar] 3d1, 4s2

    Ti ... [Ar] 3d2, 4s2

    V .... [Ar] 3d3, 4s2

    Cr.... [Ar] 3d5, 4s1

    Mn.. [Ar] 3d5, 4s2

    Fe... [Ar] 3d6, 4s2

    Ni.... [Ar] 3d7, 4s2

    Co... [Ar] 3d8, 4s2

    Cu... [Ar] 3d10, 4s1

    Zn....[Ar] 3d10, 4s2

    When one of these transition metals ionizes and actually loses one or more electrons, they will come from the 4s sublevel first, followed by the 3d. The common ions of the first-row transition metals will never have any electrons in the 4s sublevel.

    The intricacies of this are addressed in an article in the Journal of Chemical Education (April 2010) by W. H. Eugen Schwarz: The Full Story of the Electron Configurations of the Transition Elements.

    Also check out this article: https://www.chemedx.org/article/clarifying-electro...

    This diagram, showing the "collapse: of the d-orbitals comes from the article by Schwarz. It shows the energy of the 3d orbitals falling below the energy the 4s at Z-21.

    .

    Attachment image
  • 3 years ago

    Yes

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.