Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Telephoto lens buying guidance needed for Nikon D500?
For a D500 camera from Nikon, Which would be the best lens between these two:
1. Tamron AFA022N700 SP 150-600 mm Di VC USD G2 f/5.6-40.0 Telephoto-Zoom Lens.
2. Nikon's 200-500mm f/5.6
I am an amateur wildlife/bird photographer, I shall not purchase new lens and replace old ones every two years. The fixed aperture of Nikon is surely an advantage, but the larger range coverage of Tamron is alluring me. I know everything has certain limitation, but I have to choose either of these two. Please Suggest.
4 Answers
- CaoedhenLv 73 years ago
My wife has the Tamron which she uses with her D5100, almost exclusively for birding. For the price and range, it is a very impressive piece of kit.
I have no experience with the Nikon 200-500. As stated elsewhere, I would expect it to be slightly sharper than the Tamron. Price is comparable.
As far as the range difference, you'd have to take the same photo with both lenses side by side to really see the difference between 500 and 600mm. It is there, but not as much as you'd think. With a D500, you should be able to crop out half the photo without issue, making the 100mm difference really a moot point.
Renting both would be the way to choose, or go ahead and throw the Sigma 150-600 in there too just to make sure.
- SumiLv 73 years ago
If you go to opticallimits.com they have reviews of the Tamron and Sigma 150-400mm zoom. Their analysis shows that the Tamron is a bit sharper than the Sigma, but they don't have a review of the Nikon lens. If I were you, I would go to lensrentals.com or some place similar, and rent each lens. The cost of the rental will be less than the amount of depreciation that you'd take if you had to sell the lens because it wasn't the right choice. Because you can't get a feel for what the lens is like to actually use it, let alone it's AF performance, you really do need to rent before you buy because as a wildlife photographer, AF is going to be so incredibly important. My guess, and that's all it is, is that the Nikon version will probably be a bit sharper and a bit faster in focusing, too. The fact that the Nikon version has a constant f/5.6 aperture throughout the zoom range would enough for me to go with it over the Tamron or Sigma.
I would also recommend that you go to 500px.com and do a keyword search for each lens. It's one thing to look at MTF charts, but something all together different when looking at photos taken in real life situations.
- BriaRLv 73 years ago
I have the Sigma 150-600 Contemporary lens. At the time my choice (limited by budget) was between that and the Tamron. The Sigma won because of the USB dock that you can use to customise various properties of the lens and to update the firmware.
The customisation is VERY useful. One of the properties you can set is the focus distance limits. I shoot birds from several hides and can set the focus limits to suit the particular location to get faster AF.
Last time I was in a hide, 3 people had the same Sigma lens! One using Canon (me) and 2 Nikons. We all agreed that the Sigma was an A1 piece of kit.
- keerokLv 73 years ago
You buy the most mm you can find at the lowest f/number you can afford.
You don't buy lenses just to replace them later. You add lenses to your collection!