Was there a possibility of WW2 having gone stalemate between the Allies and the Nazi Germany...?

Making up history again I see. Fact, Germany did not almost defeat Russia. The problem the Russians had was political officers in control. Once they were removed the Russians hit back and hard. Germans never made it into Moscow and were fought to a standstill in Stalingrad and Leningrad then in the case of Stalingrad surrounded and destroyed. There was never a chance of a Stalemate. IDIOT.

No

If Germany had been able to conquer Russia it would have given them access to huge resources and the possibility for Germany to built its planes, and other military equipment well beyond the reach of allied bombing. It would have also freed up huge armies to be sent to France to stop the Allies from being able to invade through France. Using all the conquered manpower of Europe and all the resources of Russia to build a huge army likely they could have taken Britain. It is unlikely they could have conquered the USA and Canada as they are too large a land mass across the sea creating a huge logistical problem supplying an invading army.

No

Not remotely. Your claim about the USSR "collapsing" simply isn't at all true, nor is your claim it was under "German control."

By 1939, the Soviets were producing more war materials than Germany and by 1942 they had moved this production east of the Urals.

You're just spouting nonsense in a fanboy's attempt to make the nazis seem to be geniuses, rather than losers.

Ever notice that alternative history losers always revere shtheels like the nazis and confederates and will claim things which simply are not true to come up with scenarios for them to win?

No possibility at all - the West was guaranteed to win.

The Federal Reserve Bank has only one client and it was established for one reason - to finance foreign policy. WW1 was almost lost by Britain until the United States came into the war with their unlimited financing. Britain was almost broke and the US Federal Reserve pumped money into the coffers and pulled Britain's backside out.

WW2 was almost the same. Although there didn't appear to be much in the way of financial difficulties, the Federal Reserve's money was still a vital part of winning the war. They paid France to stay in the war until Roosevelt could get the support he needed to get the United States involved - which he managed to do only by setting up Pearl Harbor for a Japanese attack.

The main thing to take away from all of this is, the Federal Reserve Bank was established solely to finance America's foreign policy - most of which is to involve itself in other countries' affairs where they have no business. When they want to see a regime change to someone who will comply with the US dollar, they simply stir up (or, in the case of Iraq and Libya and Germany - "create") issues that will draw America into a conflict against them. They take out the heads of state and put someone in who will play ball.

The "FED" supplies the United States with all of the money it wants. This is why they are currently over 20 trillion dollars in debt - and it keeps growing. Their mandatory "balance the budget" promises they make each election cycle falls by the side of the road and the debt ceiling continues to grow higher. The United States has no sense of fiscal responsibility.

Thus, in answer to your question, there is no possibility. The "FED" would have continued to bankroll the war until the enemy (Germany in this case) ran out of money and could no longer afford to go on.

Not with the US involved.

uuqgqmgs

ftfkstpu

uuhocqgn

nkxsjegr