is this the real reason that Trump wanted to ban all muslim immigration?

I always saw Stephen as a peculiarity of the academic Jewish community, inasmuch as he was against immigration, as a Jew, and would blatantly criticize the Jewish people. The sort of mafia mentality within their community even targets fellow Jews, but the way Steinlight frames his position avoids that sort of trouble.

A pro-white Jew would clearly be, what, the second coming of Christ?

Trump isn’t against immigration, he is in favor of legal immigration, as he stated during the 2019 State of the Union Address. To him, and other neoconservatives, immigration is a mere law enforcement issue. The reason behind this means of expressing Trump’s ethnocentrism, is due to conservatism framing things as law enforcement issues when there are clearly more deadly reasons to be against something, like demographic replacement of whites in America. Many conservatives frame their ethnocentrism in a more ‘socially acceptable’ manner, this way, unfortunately.

Importing Jihad

The squalid spectacle of “Israel has hypnotized the world” Ilham Omar in the U.S. Congress should settle one question forever. Is it bigoted, irrational, or hateful to take immigration seriously?

That’s what the NeverTrumpers over at The Bulwark still claim. It’s the subtext of the sniping that Establishment Republicans still aim at Trump and his supporters.

To arrive at our answer, let’s address a few factual queries:

Q: Why is a bigoted Sunni Muslim with the narrow worldview of a Somali tribesman, who scapegoats the Jews for the chaos in her home country, serving in the U.S. Congress?

A: Because she represents a whole constituency of people who think just like her, who now live in Minnesota.

That raises another question:

Q: Why is there such a congressional district in Minnesota, which (last time I checked) does not border Somalia?

A: Because the Obama administration recruited and imported thousands of immigrants from Somalia. It spent millions of dollars to find such people, fly them over a half dozen safe, Sunni Muslim countries, and bring them to America.

So the next question:

Q: Why did the U.S. government do that? Aren’t refugees supposed to go to the ���first safe country” near their homes? So they either return when it’s safe, or assimilate more easily?

A: The Obama administration was pursuing the goal of Diversity. It was aiding in the “fundamental transformation” Obama promised of America. By breaking up communities that lacked this vital value. That is, Diversity. Minnesota and Maine didn’t have enough anti-Semitic Muslims, apparently. So the federal government stepped in to fix that. Meanwhile, Iraqi Christians, who actually had been displaced to the tune of a million people by our invasion of Iraq? They weren’t “diverse” enough, so Obama admitted virtually none of them. They still mostly languish in camps.

Divide and Squander

The Obama administration imitated the strategy of leftist governments in Europe. They too, imported distant Muslims to their countries, precisely in order to disrupt and divide the populace. And to liquidate what traces of a common Christian culture the nation might have.

The countries included were recognized sources of Islamic extremism and did not have reliable modern police records available electronically that could be used to do background checks.

False assertion within your question: Trump has never attempted to "ban all Muslim immigration". Trump has attempted to ban immigration from countries that export terrorism. There is not and never has been a ban on Muslim immigration.

They never was a "Muslim" ban