Why Mt Vesuvius, Carbon Dioxide consuming plankton, and Giant Sequoias never show up in research on Global Warming?

y would they need to. scientists in these types of studies are usually measuring atmospheric chemicals and pressures not the quantity of Phytoplankton in the ocean. it doesn't have that much relevance. 

Mt. Vesuvius because, unless it releases a lot of aerosols, it is a non-factor in climate. There are hundreds of volcanoes other than Mt. Vesuvuis, and all of them combined only add about 1% of carbon dioxide that humans add.

And, what makes you think that carbon dioxided consuming plankton and Giant Sequoias haven't been studied? Some people have even suggested adding iron to the oceans to promote the growth of such plankton to absorb carbon dioxide. An idea with pros and cons, but don't tell me that it hasn't been studied.

LMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

what a retard

Our atmosphere currently does not contain an excessive amount of carbon dioxide it does contain more methane than it has ever contained. What this means without a lot of bull crap is that the temperature is going to rise 1 or 2 degrees. Could humans one or two degrees isn't anything will just turn down the air conditioner. Which of course will accelerate the process. but 2° means that the bee colony decline is going to get way worse than it is now. Which means you and me what we eating meat we won't be eating any fruit will be forced to eat things that grow under the ground like tubers and alfalfa sprouts and a lot of beans and peanuts. What that means is that there's going to be a lot of vegetation that dies because the pollinating insect won't be here. That's inevitable it's going to happen when it does happen Life as we know it will disappear within about a hundred and fifty years. Will be back to the Stone age's for thousands of years.

So you have read all the research? Otherwise you wouldn't know everything that is or isn't included.

Wow, that's really intelligent.....