Why is Hitler consider the worst leader, when Stalin/communism killed over 50 million Christians, Muslims and Jews? Where’s  their movie?

A person can battle tyranny and the culture of death as well as the errors of Russia by working for the proper consecration of Russia to the Immaculate Heart of the Virgin Mary, by the pope together with all the Catholic bishops of the world on one special day. As of yet, the consecration has not been properly performed and Russia continues to spread its errors, such as abortion, divorce, atheism, single-gender theory, oppression of freedom of speech, sexual promiscuity, homosexual behavior, porn, fornication, communism, socialism, unjust war and persecution of Christians, around the world

Lots and lots of Socialists, Communists and Democrats love Stalin, Castro, Mao, Ho Chi Minn and others of that ilk. Nobody really identifies with Nazi's anymore, so Hitler gets absolutely no respect. (Not that he actually deserves any.)

They're movie?  You mean motive.  The motive is revisionist history.

The American left and left in general thought Lenin, Mussolini, Hitler, Stalin, and Mao were great guys at first. They were "reformers" dontcha know and that is always "good." When WWII broke out, Russia became an American ally.  The Russians were always terrified of the Germans and the US would eventually fight a two front war, so Russian help from the East was necessary.

Hitler's Final Solution was discovered and publicized and Hitler magically became a right winger when previously as a socialist, he belonged on the left. The Gulag Archipelago, something at least as bad as the camps, wasn't documented until Solzhenitsyn's book of that name was published in 1973.  By that time, Hitler was cemented as the personification of evil, and not even Mao was able to change that. Left wing is always OK to the Western left no matter how monstrous the regime. Right wing is always bad even if it is Ronald Reagan or Donald Trump neither of whom in any remote way represents what communism has done. 

So, my curious friend, it is simple public relations.  The left cannot extol the "virtues" of communism if the face of communism is evil like Stalin or Mao.  So Stalin and Mao are not evil. But they can excuse the horrors of communism if they ignore them, and point to a right wing demon.

Hitler was no good guy, but he was no worse than Mao, Stalin, Lenin or even Castro or Pol Pot, also venerated by the left. They were all inhuman. 

Russia had horrible slaughters of the innocent. Russia was an ally of Nazi Germany until the Nazis attacked them. As allies, Russia allowed Germany to attack Jews in Russia. The first thing that they did was get the town butcher to butcher the town's kids, including his own, and to butcher his own wife. On one day, in one town in Russia (called Berdichev), German soldiers machine gunned to death 25,000 people. Many died of drowning in the pool of blood, rather than dying of their own wounds. Officials of the town thought that it was from a crazy group of German soldiers who were running amok, until they contacted German command and realized that it was the government of Germany, itself, that issued the orders.

Hitler is an elitist and acts upon that narrow world view. Stalin was a hypocrite as he professed communism but acted without equity. Thus, in a way, Stalin had higher ideals and yet reduced himself in action to something ugly; whereas Hitler made ugliness come from ugliness.

There are a lot of similarities between the political environments around both men: comparing eg Himmler and Beria: both striving to be brutal to increase their standing with their dictator.

I don't think number of humans killed is a good yardstick: these things tend to depend upon effeciency of process than inbuilt depravity. And it could be argued that the firebombing of Dresden by the allies was basically targeting civilians not military targets. It is well known that Churchill felt deeply ashamed of allied carpet bombing and the firestorms that killed everyone inside the city.

Matt 4:8,9 jw.org

False premise, Hitler isn't considered the'worst leader' at all, in fact, he was a brilliant leader. He took Germany from financial ruin and turned it into the most powerful country in the world.

Still can't produce a god thingie then, a?

~

Judging any atrocity on whether or not movies have been made about it is naive and ignorant.

And do try to get your statistics right.  No-one will take your questions seriously if you exaggerate.

Because Hitler killed people because they were simply Jewish or Polish. He killed 13 million people systematically in four years

.

Stalin killed people because they were a threat to his authority (the real number is around 1-5 million NOT “50”) 

.

Hitlers reason for killing is the worst form of Satanism that has ever existed. Stalin was a monster but he stopped a bigger monster