Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Okay. President Trump has been impeach. So, why do we not know who the whistle blower is or what he/she said?

Certainly if there was a 'whistle blower' they would have testified, we'd know what they claim to have known, but even with the formal impeachment, we still do not know who the whistle blower is or what they know. Don't we have a right to face our 'accuser'? Shouldn't you need them to at least testify?

What does it tell you that we do not? Likely that they do not exist.

12 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    1 year ago

    Very strange indeed . How did these nuts ever get elected and how can anyone with an ounce of decency continue to support them after seeing how they operate . Like a mix between the KGB and mobsters . Long live our president . Vevila America .

  • 1 year ago

    We dont know because it was submitted anonymously, and trump doesnt have the right to face his accuser until it goes to trial and that happens in the senate

  • 1 year ago

    A tip can be submitted anonymously, but if this is the case, one must be represented by counsel. You can take it up with the house, they accused him and uncovered the evidence.

  • 1 year ago

    It's because the grossly unfair rules adopted by the House democrats did not allow him or any other witnesses requested by the Republicans to be called. Of course they should have been called and will be if the Senate has a full scale trial.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 1 year ago

    Because their anonymity is protected BY LAW. And it tells me that you don't know how a "whistleblower" works. Everything they said has already been corroborated by other sources.

  • 1 year ago

    There is no whistleblower. Eric Ciaramella is being protected as if he is one, but he's just a CIA hack who coordinated with Schiff to push this hoax. A real whistleblower is a witness to actual crime who goes to the authorities first rather than a politician.

  • 1 year ago

    I think everyone who has followed the news closely knows the whistleblower is Brennan's pajama boy.  LOL

  • ?
    Lv 7
    1 year ago

    Because the whistleblower's identity is not necessary. Everything the whistleblower stated has been corroborated by other witnesses.

  • 1 year ago

    The Whistleblower is protected under the Constitution! Do you hate the Constitution?

  • Anonymous
    1 year ago

    The whistleblower is Eric Ciarramella who was supplied info from Colonel Vindman.

    Thought everyone knew that?

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.