The Archbishop of Canterbury has confirmed, Meghan and Harry were not married 3 days before the official ceremony, is he the liar?

She's a liar. It started with the engagement interview. It morphed into her 'friends' leaking lies. Then she did an Oprah interview and lied about big things and tiny things easy to disprove. I don't think she can control the impulse. She assumed it would be easy in these days of forced racism to use an English Protestant church leader as her scapegoat if caught. She assumed wrong. Nobody, as Michelle Obama hinted, wants to be associated with a liar/lying whether they believe in using identity politics or not. 

No and no.

There are so many people who do not like Meghan and this colors how they take in anything that she says. This question reeks of bias.Meghan misspoke. She considered the private exchange of vows the special wedding moment for her and for Harry. Meghan's bias colored how she explained the situation. Meghan's bias made her not clearly explain things.The ceremony that legally counted was the ceremony at St. George's. Meghan knows this.I don't particularly like Meghan, but I absolutely do not like the blindly biased who think it fine to pile the attacks on someone they really do not know.And to anyone who thinks that they are not biased--EVERYONE harbors subconscious biases.https://www.learningforjustice.org/professional-de...

She did say they were "married" three days before the public ceremony

+ she knew it wasn't true

= LIE.

She never claimed it was a legal marriage.  She said they exchanged personal vows in the Archbishop's presence.  Private vow exchanges aren't uncommon.

Well The Archbishop will have a hard time from his boss upstairs if he did.

Look, it's said that there were only 3 there on that occasion.    Had it been a legitimate/legal marriage ceremony, in the UK (if not elsewhere?) there should have been 2 witnesses and the ability for others to be there to object to the wedding at the given point in the ceremony.

The Archbishop of Canterbury was clearly there to guide them through the marriage ceremony - A REHEARSAL.    She was misinformed.    And I don't think this was the only thing she didn't understand.

What would the Archbishop gain from lying? He isn't the one building a story of destruction. Playing devils advocate, Meghan didn't necessarily lie, she could just have been mistaken.

Edit...Answer reinstated with a courteous apology.