When Hillary and the DNC paid foreign agent Christopher Steele to interfere in the 2016 election, did you consider it a treasonous act?

The Steele Dossier was published on January 10th 2017, so how exactly did that cause interference with the 2016 election?

Was it treasonous when Republicans were using them or just when Hillary hired them? 🤔

Steele actually informed our intelligence agencies about Russia’s interference, which prompted the investigations into Trump’s campaign. Steele was the head of Foreign Intelligence in Britain, he didn’t “interfere” with anything, he provided needed intelligence. 

You really don't have a clue what the word "treason" mean, do you. 

Amended:  Nope, that isn't what treason is.  But since you came on here to get educated:  "Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort".

@Judy.........Hillary was never investigated or testified regarding her paying a foreign agent to interfere in the 2016 election.

Imagine if Trump paid a foreign agent to create the Biden dossier.

oh. my god.

The fact that the DNC can pay a foreign agent to interfere in the election and nothing happens to anyone (while Trump was impeached for allegedly something similar in Ukraine) is proof the deep state protects itself.

It's an obvious lie.

You lie...............

Holy f*ck. 

You say we're obsessed with Trump, and you go back to THIS shlt?

You need to get a life.

Do meth heads still say that?

Well, she didn't do that, so it couldn't have been treasonous.