1 vote, 1 voter, 1 machine count, 1 close observer, 1 signature verified, no changing law by the governors in the during the election,...?

there was NO fraud. Ever seen a long lineup in rich republican neighbourhoods? in Georgia " It also gives the Republican-controlled state government new power to assert control over the conduct of elections in Democratic counties" That is plain wrong.

I would remove the machine from that. They can, and do, lie. Here is one lying while it is being watched: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t75xvZ3osFg

When the thumb-drives are collected and aggregated into a higher-level machine there is even more scope for manipulation. Here are nearly 20,000 votes being switched between candidates as the totals are being watched on live TV: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ez3QrbGPPNo

If you do not want to rig the machines then you can just present a few hundred thousand fraudulent ballots and not be very stringent about verifying them. That is how Pennsylvania counted 2.4 million mail-in votes even though it mailed out only 1.8 million: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/giuliani-...

@Houdini@ No, it is not like that now. It is as I described above.

A solution in search of a problem. The only voter fraud that occurred in my state was perpetrated by trump supporters.  And I can make that claim, because unlike republican claims that democrats "stole" the election, there is evidence. You know, evidence, as in proof that something actually happened.   

We already have laws in place. 

You're supposed to prove the widespread fraud before you enact measures that supposedly fix it ... especially when those measures selectively target voters who usually vote dem.

And at least one Photo ID...

That's the way it is now.  Everybody knows that.  Where's your evidence anyone changed anything that caused things not to be like that?  We'll be waiting.......

@I'm That Mexican, that, too, is in place in the U.S.  It's called "voter registration".  If you were actually in the U.S., you'd know that.

Nothing. You’re trying to limit who’s votes count, we completely understand you. It’s just wrong. Try winning voters over some time. 

It wouldn't allow cheating.

THAT'S the problem.

That's the way it is now. 

Why do you want to make "specific" people wait in lines 8 to 10 hours, then lock people up if they are brought some water?