Why are atheists so contradictory?

The fact of the matter: The reason why Charles Darwin did it in the first place was to attract attention he even said on his death bed he thought it was a hoax, and that most people would not believe him, that just goes to show you how stupid mankind is. if you feed enough people full of crap, they are going to believe anything you tell them, just like Charles Darwin did and now look, most so-called intelligent people think that we evolve from nothing, when in fact nothing can evolve from nothing, everything needs a creator and that creator is God The Lord Jesus Christ our Lord and Savior, whether you want to believe it or not, it is totally 100% up to you, nobody can change your mind except eternal God only.

"independently produced cosmological arguments to prove the existence of a divine supreme Creator." - no dear.  The existence of some Creator or deity has not been proven.  

Scientists that believe in some god are not proof said god exists.

That's not irony, that's a straw man fallacy.

Evolution rests on overwhelming scientific evidence, not on the number of scientists who accept it. Also, atheism has nothing to do with evolution.

Cosmological arguments are NOT evidence of God.  Popularity is not evidence, either.

Then why are all the arguments for god different and only one is required against

No proof of any god has been provided

What i find ironic is atheists love to justify their belief with science, but most famous scientists believed in God. One being Isaac Newton

And yet, never, not even once, has anyone ever produced

A solitary scrap of verifiable evidence for a god critter.

-

If you have "substantial" evidence supporting your god thingie, lay it out - but be aware that the way you feel when you look at puppies or sunsets, or conversations you had with yourself, or your inability to explain something any other way do not constitute evidence.

-

Dreams are not evidence.

Wishful thinking is not evidence.

Logical fallacies are not evidence.

Personal revelation is not evidence.

Illogical conclusions are not evidence.

Disproved statements are not evidence.

Unsubstantiated claims are not evidence.

Hallucinations/delusions are not evidence.

Information that is ambiguous is not evidence.

The Universe doesn't care what you believe in.

Data that requires a certain belief is not evidence.

Information that cannot be verified is not evidence.

Information that cannot be falsified is not evidence.

Experiments with inconclusive results are not evidence.

Information that is only knowable by a privileged few is not evidence.

Experiments that are not and cannot be duplicated by others are not evidence.

The wonderful thing about science is that it doesn't ask for your faith, only your eyes.

~~~

If bible-god is so smart, why can't he convince atheists that he exists?

Hypothesis: Bibel-god doesn't exist.

Hey, that works perfectly!

It explains all the data.

First try too... 😎

~

There are thousands of different gods worshipped by people around the world and thousands more that are now extinct because no-one follows them now. The major religious groups cannot agree on what their gods are or how to worship them which is why there is sectarian violence between religious groups with Christians against Christians, Muslims against Muslims etc.

All that effort and there is no testable evidence anywhere that any of the gods actually exists.

On the other hand, there is overwhelming evidence to support evolution which is why it is accepted by theists and atheists alike including all the mainstream Christian religions.

probably cause they dont believe in god

That is actually different. However, I can understand how scientific research might be beyond your meager mental faculties.