Todd R

Keeping in mind that the U.S. is one of the few nations that has ratified the Kyoto Protocol because it "would ruin the economy" (Bush) - do you think making a profit has something to do with the mostly domestic (U.S.) controversy surrounding human activity as significantly involved w/ accelerating climate change?

For example:

Some might argue environmentalists have a lot to gain by getting millions in research grants, hocking their "green" wares for profit, and making bank by raising taxes (o! those pesky, profiteering liberals!).

Others might say Corporations, such as the Petroleum Industry, have a lot to lose, especially if alarmed citizens want alternative energy sources.

And still others might say Eternal Salvation in priceless: Global Warming is a sign of the Apocalypse and is awesome for the saved!

Where do you stand? Who has the most to gain/lose? What do YOU personally have to gain/lose on your side of the "debate"?

If, as many are saying, Al Gore is lying about Global Warming, what would be motivating him to do so?

And/or why would conservatives believe Global Warming is a lie?