Luke

Hi, I am Luke Murphy and I have a Youtube channel called Nuclear-Skull87 and for the last few times I have uploaded Youtube videos I have not been able to upload custom thumbnails of my own making and it's weird because I have had my Youtube account verified for a little over two years now. Any idea on how to fix this problem?

What about Canada is so romanticized unlike other countries in the British led commonwealth like say Australia, South Africa, India as well as Great Britain. I am guessing it's a combination of different thing like it's large French-Speaking Province Quebec combined with it's more mythical northern hemisphere vibe and plus its the history of both French and British colonization that founded it there. Among other things of course. What do you think though?

For me I might lean towards Japanese Kabuki because I love the wigs and makeup as well just a slightly weirder and creepier look to it. I like them both though. How about you though?

I would say for me the removal and genocide of Native Americans and I would say it's because you know they are the natives that we're here first and I find myself not always knowing how to get perspective on the guilt issue without feeling like you are rationalizing the history of what we had done to the USA's indigenous population. Plus people including non-native Americans are so ungodly rigid and ideological about it sometimes to the point they will almost guilt trip you into being unpatriotic or ashamed of your own country because they think it's the only way you are going to recognize that historical reality.

How about for you though. What racist chapter in American-History causes you the most guilt and as such causes you to feel the least patriotic as such?

For me I love them both equally because they are both awesome and cool in they're own way. Star Wars is cool because it is Space Opera meets Kabuki-Samurai. While Star Trek is cool because it has such an awesome and colorful variety of alien races.

How about you though what do you like better between Star Wars and Trek and why?

I know that Nuclear Weapons and Biological-Weapons are both weapons of mass destruction along with Chemical-Weapons. But just between Nuclear Weapons and Biological Weapons what do you think would be worse and why?

For me I would have to say Star Wars, because I just love the combination of Space-Opera meets Kabuki-Samurai and I like the whole of the jedi and synth concept as well. Plus, I am not really into 1930s or 40s style Pulp Adventure. How about you though> What do you like more and why?

I know it bothers me to no end, because I like how distinctive the decades from that century (Due to how quickly things started to change then) and saying such a term to me feels like you are trying to make all homogeneous by essentially scrunching them up together. Does it bother you though and why?

Yes, I know I have asked something like this in the past, but I am just feeling the fallout of a conversation I had with my mom regarding this last night and I am still feeling agitated about it.

I know it's most commonly associated with 19th Century Victorian-Era Gothic-Fiction (E.G. Dr Jekyl & Mr. Hyde, Frankenstein, Dracula) and than continued in old horror-films of the 1950s, 60s ,70s and onwards.

But was the 19th century unique in that it started that "dark & stormy night" trope or is it just most known for it?

No. I don't have any desire to move to Canada and prefer to stay in my home-nation of the USA. I am just curious to know what is a more expensive-country to take up residence in.

For me it's 20th and 21st Century (yes including the current-one) because those are the first-two centuries in-which decades begin to carve out distinct-identities of they're own and just to use overgeneralizing-terms like those in my opinions causes said Decade-Distinctions to become blurred. And that's why I dislike these terms being used.

How about for you though what terms personally make you cringe when you overhear them or read them being used in articles or conversations and why?

I know I am angry at Disney for it because A. 20th Century Fox has been going downhill since than. B. Huge-amounts of layoffs at Fox happened causing them to lose they're jobs and we don't know how many of them have gone homeless as a result and C. Rupert Murdoch's motivation to downsize (through this sale) is a lame-excuse to create a monopoly.

How about you though what is your opinion on the Disney-Fox deal and why?

I know you bring a set of earplugs to a rock-concerts or a football-game. But how about a professional-Wrestling match?

For me I would say they do, because they cause both of they're constituent-decades in both centuries to seem less distinct than they really are and try to bundle-them up too much in one homogeneous-bag as if decades in both the 20th and 21st Century are no-more different from each-other than say decades in the Medieval-Rennaissance times just for example.

What do you think though? Do you believe saying 20th Century and 21st Century causes both of they're decades to seem less distinct? Why or why not?

I would say for me it would be working a salary-job because of you hate driving you can A. Turn in your driver's license and B. Sell your vehicle and get some cash.

Working a job for a living on the other-hand is a lot more stressful in my opinion because it's a lot harder to get yourself off the treadmill of the capitalist-system as you almost always need to work your behind off just to be able to live and it's (usually at least) a lot harder to make the money needed to secure financial-autonomy and not have to work another-way of your life again.

How about for you though. What do you find more stressful between the two-thinfa and why?

Me and my sister Rachel this Friday are thinking about going to visit a Monster-Truck show up in Grants Pass Oregon and I was wondering if we should wear earplugs or headset to it like you would a more traditional Monster-Jam show?

I mean they are both bad of course. But if you had to pick what do you think is worse?

E.G. Fashion, movies, Videogames among other such-things once the current-decade of the 2010s is over.

I mean Willem Defoe had ancestors that moved to Ontario for a while. Ellen DeGeneres has French-Canadian ancestry and Jimi Hendrix had a dad who fleed to Canada to escape Jim Crow laws. Even Sarah Palin has canuck-roots. Why is it that so many American-Celebrities have roots from the Great-White-North?