Soldier4Christ_82

then why not allow women to perform oral sex on their husbands in public? I mean who cares that it's immodest and not suitable public behavior, husbands have needs just like babies, so while we're allowing women to have their breasts hanging out for the whole world to see, which is supposedly OK because "it's a natural act", why not just make believe that all behavior that belongs behind closed doors is acceptable in public just because "it's a natural act"?

then why do they still get so offended when it comes out of the mouth of a white person?

It's not a word I use, and I'm not defending it by any means, but I just can't for the life of me understand the logic of claiming to take away the power of a word if the power is only taken away when it comes out the mouth of a fellow black person and still incites a knee jerk reaction when it's a white person using it.

why can't you folks who have the nerve to call yourselves "tolerant" actually be as tolerant of people who don't embrace homosexuality with open arms, and accept the fact that you don't have to love the perverted lifestyle that someone chooses to lead in order to love them as a person?

You people praise those who have the "courage" to come out as homosexuals in an age where anyone who so much as utters a peep of criticism against homosexuality for any reason is automatically an evil bigot who wants homosexuals to be put in concentration camps, yet you demonize the the truly courageous; those who have the conviction to defend Christianity and traditional morality in an age where the only mention of the name of Jesus' name that is encouraged outside of church is when it's being taken in vain and the only morals most people have are made up as they go based on what feels good in the moment.

they claim their rights are being violated by surveillance cameras that are put in places where everyone around them can see what they're doing?

How can people who can't even stand for their public actions to be seen or recorded somehow manage to convince themselves that they have the right to be outraged that their government doesn't make every single piece of information at their disposal available to the general public?

turn right around and try to convince the very people who are involuntarily funding her irresponsible, whorish lifestyle with their tax dollars that it's somehow none of their business just because it's her body?

isn't it just as wrong for people who don't own guns to be allowed to vote on gun control issues?

The illegal immigrant who works his fingers to the bone under the table every day in conditions many legal citizens would sue or strike over just so that he can provide for his family, or the legal citizen who sits at home all day and collects a welfare or disability check when he's perfectly capable of going out and getting a job?

When people make the claim that something is a basic human right, that means that the right starts at birth, so when you claim that marriage is a basic human right you're saying that it's a violation of children's rights to deny them the right to marry, which is equally as ridiculous as claiming that it's a violation of homosexuals' basic human rights to deny them the right to marry.

I mean think about it, really think it through; why would our government pass up on such a golden opportunity to generate the profit that legalizing marijuana would have brought for so many decades if there were so much of a shred of legitimate proof of it being the harmless magical cure-all that marijuana smokers make it out to be?

Where are they getting the impression that they have the right to spout off whenever and however they want without there being any natural or legal consequences?

After all, politely assuming the whole "women can do anything men can" mantra isn't a huge crock of manure, can't women fend off attackers just as easily as men?

Also, politely assuming that they are just as capable of defending themselves against attackers, isn't it their fault if they're raped when they had the capability to fend the rapist off?

behind the annoncement made on airplanes, "Will all passengers requiring wheelchairs please remain in their seats"?

What other possible choices do they have?

Are they afraid that the people are just going to throw themselves onto the floor and crawl out of the plane?

Assuming that a sleigh, around the size that Santa is attributed to having, is fully loaded with presents, and a morbidly obese man such as Santa was driving it, what speed would the reindeer be able to get up to while pulling it?

Does the fact that something is illegal make it inherently wrong wrong, or is it that the fact that it's wrong mean that it should be illegal?

the well-being of a country, or upholding the right of it's politically ignorant majority to vote?

Is the novelty of allowing everyone in a country to have an equal say in how it's run and who it's run by really worth the cost of it being flushed down the toilet in the name of democracy?

If they're so lazy that they can't even be bothered to take the entire second that it takes to press one button on their keypad then how in the world do they manage to drag themselves out of bed and get dressed in the morning?

Never once have I heard of black people being accused of racism for criticizing white presidents, and yet all of the sudden, now that Obama is in office, if you're white and you so much as utter a PEEP of dissent against him you're automatically branded a racist.

.