?

So here's the scoop. My fiancee is a Physician's Assistant who was recently forced to resign from a healthcare corporation with no clear cause. The only thing that was clear was her end date, which was May 31st. Needless to say, this has put us through some financial strife, and so she needs to withdraw from her 401K account. However, in order to avoid the penalties, she needs to demonstrate that we are going through hardship. NOW.... she told the retirement office that she is unemployed for the time being, and this -evidently- is sufficient cause for wavering the withdrawal penalties, BUT... every time the retirement office has contacted her previous employer (which has been every day), they claim that she is still a current employee. The problem is that HR hasn't taken the 30 seconds it takes to remove her from their database. It is now June 12. which is thirteen days after her termination, and she is still listed as a current employee. In spite of continued efforts to explain to them why they need to fix this, they have lied to us and claimed that it'll be done, "within the next couple of business days," and dragged their feet on it. Now they're simply stone-walling her. PLEASE tell me that there is something illegal about this! They are interfering with our livelihood by refusing to do their jobs! Are there any court cases in WI -or, for that matter, federal cases- that have ruled against this kind of BS? We need leverage here!

Thanks in advance for your help!

-L

I had the same problem with my other Toshiba. I'm using Windows 7. I've checked my firewall, I've changed web browsers, the whole nine yards. Why does it refuse to access certain websites at certain times? I get a message on Google Chrome that says, "Unable to access the network." Does anyone have any solutions?

This question is for the swapping of intellectual speculations ONLY. I want no evangelizing, or things being stated as brute fact.

It is well known that God cannot be disproven since it is impossible to disprove a non-tautological existential claim. Of course, any reasonable person also recognizes the fact that God is yet to be proven, either. So it seems that the only way to arrive at a conclusion in this regard is to rely on probability. What, then, seems more probable to you: a universe that was created by an intelligent being (i.e. God), or a universe that was neither created nor is governed by said being?