What, what, what??

If you do, how, why, when, and in what context do you deny it? Is it something that you do alone, with a partner or a group? And, what kinds conclusions, if any, have resulted from this activity? Would you do it again? Do you tend to do it all the time? How do you know when you do it? Thanks in advance!

I have looked at different forms for this specific purpose and they usually make a direct assertion as to agreement. To be more specific, they are written in such a way that assumes that the creditor will or HAS agreed to the terms set into the agreement written. When not wanting to talk directly to the creditor (only wanting to keep things in writting), is this type of written agreement customary (the language and assumptions made within it) to send to a creditor when initially negotiating?

Would you use another heading? What would it be instead?

To secure a position performing an administrative function; one that would apply my practical and formal knowledge of statistical analysis, operations management, economic principles, project management, organizational, and/or other developed skills, in a demanding, fast paced business environment. Proficient in Microsoft Word, PowerPoint, Excel and Access; familiar with familiar with Crystal Ball, Microsoft Project and Sagata Regression Forecasting Programs.

Why?

If the employer asserts that it is a computer that will choose your resume (using key words) and that you can submit more than one page?

I need a 'link' or website cited. I have been searching and searching. I'm still searching. I appreciate any help that you can give.

A previous question asked, "What is a Legal Analyst? And this was the answer that was chosen as best...and it did seem to be the best when looking at the other answers:

"It's something which only exists in North America. It's a person who, under general supervision, provides paralegal and legal analytical support work including legal research and drafting of routine and complex legal documents. Such a person must have legal training and be able to make sound recommendations."

Or is it too late?

I know I'm evil...but I just couldn't resist.

Do you know who they are?

I'm talking educated, verifiable differences...not just mud slung commentary.

These are the competing individuals leff:

Blake Lewis

Jordan Sparks

Lakisha Jones

Chris Richardson

Melinda Doolittle

Stephanie Edwards

Phil Stacey

Sangaya Malakar

Aside from who you think is going to be the next to go, who do you think has the most potential?

who had the reputation (through what you were told prior to meeting them) of putting the 'fear of God' in family members (members seemed to have a keen respect or fear of them, per se) (specifically, this is a mother and she is the only female in the immediate family)? What was your experience? How did you handle the situation and did the meeting event work out well?