Reality Check

https://soundcloud.com/smashinggroundband/one-of-a...

Me and my wife are currently buying a home, and the seller signed a contract agreeing to a radon test and a home inspection. However, the seller is now claiming she wants a licensed inspector to inspect the home. It is to my understanding that the buyer has the say in who inspects the home, not the seller. Legally, does the buyer have the choice to have who they want inspect the home in Pennsylvania? If you could, please provide links. Thank you!

The right measure and comparison for Obama’s record is not to compare the recovery to the recession, but to compare Obama’s recovery with other recoveries from other recessions since the Great Depression. By that measure, what is clear is that Obamanomics has produced the worst recovery from a recession since the Great Depression, worse than what every other President who has faced a recession has achieved since the Great Depression.

I used data from the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. It’s taken 64 months for the present recovery to regain the ground lost since the beginning of the Great Recession, whereas 64 months into the Reagan recovery, jobs had grown 9.5% higher than where they were when that recession started, representing an increase of about 10 million more jobs. (Not that I promote Reaganomics, but the point is there) By contrast, taking population growth into account, the present recession has cost 10 million jobs. The unemployment rate, according to the Minneapolis Fed, has stayed higher longer than at any time since the 1930s, and that’s using government figures and not the real unemployment rate that has been replaced by new “updated” calculations.

The average American family is worse off, in inflation-adjusted terms, than they were before the great recession began in 2007. Poverty levels have increased, along with government regulations. I came across this after the Federal Reserve of St. Louis released its report that any economic “recovery” as measured by gains in the stock market have failed to help those on the lower end of the economic scale. In its May 30 report, the Fed concluded that the average American family has recovered less than half of what it lost since the Great Recession bottomed out in the summer of 2009 mostly because the average family has little invested in the stock market and instead have most of their real wealth invested in real property, mostly their personal homes. Despite some recovery in home prices, that has done precious little to help the average family to recover lost ground significantly.

I think we need to look back a little farther though to the 1920-21 depression. This just shows how a nearly free market economy really responds when it's left to it's own devices. There was a sharp decline in productivity that began in January 1920 of almost 30 percent (far deeper than that of the present Great Recession), the economy rebounded by more than 60 percent so that by July 1921, unemployment had fallen to normal low-single-digit levels. This set the stage for the Roaring Twenties, when the economy doubled in output in just over seven years.

http://www.minneapolisfed.org/publications_papers/...

http://www.policymic.com/articles/15983/u6-unemplo...

http://www.stlouisfed.org/newsroom/displayNews.cfm...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1921_recession

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roaring_Twenties

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Gdp20-40.jpg

I see it all too much that the left seems to pin EVERYTHING on Bush or just Republicans. While Bush was certainly not a good president, President Obama has been in the chair for about 5 years. You conveniently forget that the left is also responsible for just as much destruction to our country. They have perpetuated our debt, and display this facade of "we appreciate civil liberties", but do nothing to defend them. 1/3 (on average) of our entire paychecks every year goes to the government. About 33 cents of every dollar you make. How much taxes is enough? Shouldn't we cut SOMETHING?

Like the Dems, Repubs fail to create any type of budget that would reduce our debt. Any budget that has been proposed only reduces the rate of spending, not reduce the debt itself. You also tend to sway towards a conservative approach of domestic issues like marijuana, and abortion. (I don't agree with abortion, however, I don't believe it is my place to choose what someone else does, nor do I think it is anyone Else's.) If you truly appreciate the constitution, you will know that the 10th amendment specifically leaves issues like these to the states, or the people, and not the federal government. It should be about freedom, not moral control. I thought being a republican was about working hard, and liberty.

"Over the last four years, the deficit has gone up, but 90 percent of that is as a consequence of" President George W. Bush’s policies and the recession. -Barack Obama

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements...

This statement is false. In Fact Obama continued, and supported most of these pricey programs

"Fast and Furious" began under the Bush administration. - Barack Obama

http://www.politifact.com/florida/statements/2012/...

This statement is false. It began in 2009 under his administration.

The plain truth of it all? It's everybody's fault. Republican and Democrat. Spin it how you want.

http://www.factcheck.org/2012/02/dueling-debt-dece...

http://www.policymic.com/articles/7565/neither-bus...

http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitution/...

http://www.policymic.com/articles/22837/ndaa-what-...

http://www.scn.org/ccapa/pa-vs-const.html

"To summarize, the largest culprit in the rise of the national debt is increased federal spending, mainly due to social programs. Secondarily, federal revenues are down as a consequence of lower tax receipts from all income groups. In this regard, it is important not to confuse lower tax revenues with lower marginal tax rates. As federal data going back to 1950 shows, tax revenues and marginal tax rates don’t necessarily correspond—and tax policies that allow for a robust economy can result in more tax revenues with lower marginal tax rates.

This data on federal spending and revenues are the concrete causes of the national debt, and if one is looking for someone to blame or someone to remedy the problem, it ultimately boils down to those who have the most power to control these factors: American citizens who exercise their right to vote."

http://www.justfactsdaily.com/blame-for-the-nation...

My question is, despite all of the evidence, despite all of the facts, why do you continue to support these elitists who are not looking out for your best interests, but to look good in the eyes of the people who vote for them? Wouldn't you rather support freedom than statism?

Don't say it's pointless to support another party. If your saying that, it's because your not even trying. Your a part of the problem then

In 1913, the Democrats wanted a more centralized banking system, and they did just that with the Federal Reserve Bank. It would lower interest rates, regulate the amount of money in the economy and control inflation. All of this sounds good right? The reserve was ratified by Congress in the same year.

Things went right initially. The Federal Reserve drastically reduced interest rates, and fueled by recent stock gains, stock market investment was at an all time high. The Stock Market was making gains approaching 20% per year in the mid-1920s, while the interest rate was around 1% at the time. If you could borrow money at 1% and get a return of 20% with inflation being marginal, wouldn't that sound like a good idea? Thus, massive loans were taken out. The economy was in the best shape it had ever been. But there was a problem.

Inflation started happening as people bought more and more, and there soon was too much money chasing too few goods. As incomes went up, so do costs. The Federal Reserve had to maintain a steady flow of money into the economy to keep the economy running. Thus, the economy had become dependent not only on the low interest rates for growth, they had become dependent on a steady supply of money flowing in.

To try to counteract this inflation, the Federal Reserve raised interest rates. This caused fewer loans to be given out and less money to be flowed into the economy. The savvy investors saw this, and got out of the market. This weakened the market. The other investors saw the slowdown in the growth, and immediately panicked, and withdrew all their money as fast as they could. Some investors who saw this happening got out of the marketplace early, weakening the bullish market. As the markets stopped going up investors began to panic and sell their shares of stock. Over leveraged investors scared of losing their life savings sold their shares of stock and forced the market downward. This caused the stock market to nose dive. Americans started saving more and more, causing the essential parts of GDP, Consumption and Investment to be drastically reduced, this having a disastrous effect on GDP itself. After the crash Americans started spending less and started saving more. This lead to less production and less jobs, causing unemployment to go higher and higher. And thus, we have a recession.

The Federal Reserve at the time was doing the exact opposite of "correct" monetary policy. Normal monetary policy is to have low interest rates during recessions, high interest rates during inflation, and medium interest rates at all other times. But before the crash, which started out normal and then turned into an extreme boom period, the Federal Reserve's interest rates, as stated earlier at 1%. You could borrow money at 1%.. This was bound to be a disaster as infation was encouraged and a huge boom was created that was so large that the pace could not be kept up. And because of that, when the Federal Reserve had to raise interest rates, there was a crash.

When you pump money into the economy during infation, you are basically just contributing more to inflation. This caused the interest rates to be raised higher and to be raised higher quicker.

And what happened is that the FED followed policies which led to a decline in the quantity of money by a third. For every $100 in paper money, in deposits, in cash, in currency, in existence in 1929, by the time you got to 1933 there was only about $65 left. And that extraordinary collapse in the banking system, with about a third of the banks failing from beginning to end, with millions of people having their savings essentially washed out, that decline was utterly unnecessary.

The Federal Reserve caused a decline in money in 1929 (not to be confused with the pumping of money in the mid-1920s that caused the inflation in the first place) that restricted the amount of money flowing into the economy. This is disasterous during a recession when you need all the money you can get.

This massive destruction of liquidity began when the Federal Reserve responded to the 1929 stock market crash by allowing the quantity of money to decline by 2.6 percent over the next year. This extremely tight monetary policy put the economy into severe recession.

Too many believe the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act is solely responsible for the cause of the Great Depression. It only made it worse. The Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act was dumb since GDP=C+I+G+X, you want to raise GDP in a depression, and Tariff Acts would lower net exports (the X), which would lower GDP

In conclusion, after it was all said and done, and the depression ended, we ended up losing 27% of the dollars purchasing power because of the FED.

In a stunning depiction of how bad our tax code has become, the Wall Street Journal on March 10 found that 60 major U.S. companies parked a total of $166 billion abroad last year, enabling them to avoid almost $100 billion in taxes. Otherwise put, around 40 percent of these companies’ aggregate total earnings were shielded from taxes — and also made unavailable for paying dividends or making investments in the United States. Ten of the companies actually parked more money offshore than they made in profits, highlighting the desperate measures American companies are now willing to resort to in order to avoid the voracious maw of the American taxman.

With top combined state and federal corporate tax rates at about 40 percent, the United States — once the “land of opportunity” and of free-market enterprise — now has the highest corporate tax rate in the developed world, and a federal government frantically looking for further corporate tax “loopholes” to close that will raise rates higher still. In such a context, it is little wonder that so many of America’s top companies choose to move their business to lower-taxed jurisdictions overseas. In the case of many high-tech and health-care companies, this includes even moving patent rights and other types of intellectual properties to overseas subsidiaries.

It is estimated that the federal government lost $42 billion in tax revenue due to such tax avoidance practices last year alone; yet instead of seeking ways to lower rates to make the U.S. corporate tax code once again competitive with the rest of the world, and provide incentives for U.S. companies to return home, all the talk in Washington is about closing loopholes, raising rates, and, in general, finding ways to squeeze more money out of U.S. corporations. U.S. citizens are already the only citizens in the developed world whose government taxes them on all money earned while living abroad (prompting increasing numbers of wealthy American citizens to renounce their U.S. citizenship). Before long, one suspects that U.S. corporations will be denied the option of moving assets overseas, as a more determined, desperate, and confiscatory class of tax feeders on Capitol Hill tightens the tax noose.

Americans are frequently encouraged by politicians and the media to disparage and despise “multinational corporations” because of their allegedly heartless fixation on profits and their avoidance, wherever possible, of their “patriotic duty” to pay taxes. But tax rates of 30 or 40 percent are not imposts; they are naked seizure of property, a de facto attempt to nationalize nearly half the assets of the corporate sector.

http://www.thenewamerican.com/economy/sectors/item...

At some point in time, we need to acknowledge that not every dollar spent by the government, is a good thing

So Rand Paul is standing there as long as he can to defend your right to due process. I have a serious question. Why is this not a bipartisan effort? Why dont you support his efforts? The point is, no president should have this power regardless of affiliation.

This isnt about party. This isnt about biases. This is about a right that was fought and died for, and it seems so many of you are so willing to throw it away. Please tell me, WHY?

the nomination? This is an honest question, considering, Dr. Paul has been capturing more then half the delegates in Minnesota, Iowa, Alaska, Massachusetts, Louisana, Washington state, Maine, Virginia, Missouri, Colorado, and Michigan. He's also expected to do the same in Nevada. It seems Dr. Pauls supporters have captured many delegate spots in alot of states and are really making some serious headway

This will explain the rules

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mDPK4GCprYA&list=UU...

This is not some kind rediculous hoax to make anybody else believe Paul will win the nomination, but if this holds true, he does have a MUCH greater chance then I anticipated. If the delegates really arnt 'bound', and most of them have been open paul supporters, doesnt Paul still have a serious chance of winning the nomination considering alot of the delegate numbers on the MSM, are guesses?

This will explain

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q-O0jgRgo4I&list=UU...

I can already tell, I will recieve alot of rediculous hate from this question, but history has shown us the Warren Harding, went into the convention with only 6% of the delegates, and walked out with the nomination. So why is that an unnacceptible idea today? Im not saying Paul will win the nomination (as much as I would like him to). Im saying it looks like he has a much better chance, according to the RNC rules about 'bound' delegates, and his supporters taking over state caucuses all over

Thoughts?

A serious answer would be appreciated, not the typical, 'blah blah (insert biased answer here) blah blah'

A good reason why or why not would be nice

It is important to understand that the FED does not actually print money, All U.S. currency is in fact printed by the Bureau of Engraving and Printing (BEP). The Fed, rather is the master distributor of the money, which they "create" this way by executing a simple computer entry in their accounting system.

Despite what many people think, the Federal reserve is NOT an agency of the United States government.

They are no more a part of the Federal government than is Federal Express. The Federal Reserve is actually a privately owned corporation, owned by a secret group of international bankers. In essence, they are a private banking cartel who have a total monopoly on "creating" money for the U.S. government. The Fed's only real agenda is to turn a profit and they do so at the expense of every single man, woman and child living in the U.S.A..

If you ask the average person you meet on the street, What is the Fed ? and What do they do ? Most (if they have any idea at all) will say they think the Fed is an agency of the U.S. government, and that they serve to help stabilize our economy by controlling interest rates and providing liquidity when needed.

Nothing could be further from the truth. They really have 1 agenda and 1 agenda only. That is to turn a profit.

They do this in 2 different ways:

They manipulate interest rates to create "boom-bust" cycles which always work out to the advantage of the hidden elite "insiders". . .

as they know exactly when our economy will boom, and when it will bust.

They increase the money supply by "creating" money through the incredibly lucrative "sweet heart" deal

they've had with the U.S. government, ever since the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 was signed into law.

Accordingly, when the U.S. Government needs money, they go to the Fed to borrow the money. The Fed calls the Treasury and asks them to print x amount of Federal Reserve Notes (FRN) in units of one hundred dollars. The Treasury charges the Fed 2.3 cents for each note. The Fed then lends that money to the government at face value plus interest. The government has to create a bond for the loan amount as security for the loan.

Now the government owes the private ownership of the Fed the face value of the bonds plus interest. In other words, the Fed earns interest by "loaning" that money to the U.S. government. Imagine that... they earn interest by loaning money which is not even theirs to loan...

which they just created out of thin air.

So essentially every bill they "create" has a debt associated to it, and if the debt is not paid, what do you think they do ?

That's right. They create more Federal Reserve Notes so they can loan more to the government (actually exchange for U.S. bonds)

in order to pay off the debt, thereby growing the national debt even more.

This is what we refer to as a debt monetary system. In other words, our currency has a debt attached to it before we ever spend any of it. We can never get out of debt because it is a self propagating, vicious cycle, that will ultimately end with the complete destruction of our currency and bankruptcy of our nation.

They can NOT be audited and do NOT answer to the President or anyone for that matter. The president appoints the Board of Governors but has no control over their secret activities. Congress knows nothing of the conversations, plans, and actions taken in concert with other central banks. We get less and less information regarding the money supply each year, especially now that M3 is no longer reported.

Not only is the Fed exempt from tax, but 100% of the income tax that Americans pay, goes right to the Fed to pay off this debt, which they perpetually create. It is no coincidence that the Federal Income tax law was enacted in the same year as the Federal Reserve Act. It was needed to finance this scam. Prior to this, the U.S prospered and the government paid it's bills with out needing revenue from income tax. But that all ended with the enactment of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913. From that point forward, income tax was required to pay for the debt owed to the Fed for interest on the money they create and loan out to the U.S. government. This is just beyond insanity.

"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties that standing armies"

-Thomas Jefferson

In accordance with Thomas Jefferson's views, Article 1, Section 8 of the US Constitution specifically says that Congress is the only body that can "coin money and regulate the value thereof." The US Constitution has never been amended to allow anyone other than Congress to coin and regulate currency.

It is important to understand that the FED does not actually print money, All U.S. currency is in fact printed by the Bureau of Engraving and Printing (BEP). The Fed, rather is the master distributor of the money, which they "create" this way by executing a simple computer entry in their accounting system.

Despite what many people think, the Federal reserve is NOT an agency of the United States government.

They are no more a part of the Federal government than is Federal Express. The Federal Reserve is actually a privately owned corporation, owned by a secret group of international bankers. In essence, they are a private banking cartel who have a total monopoly on "creating" money for the U.S. government. The Fed's only real agenda is to turn a profit and they do so at the expense of every single man, woman and child living in the U.S.A..

If you ask the average person you meet on the street, What is the Fed ? and What do they do ? Most (if they have any idea at all) will say they think the Fed is an agency of the U.S. government, and that they serve to help stabilize our economy by controlling interest rates and providing liquidity when needed.

Nothing could be further from the truth. They really have 1 agenda and 1 agenda only . . . that is to turn a profit.

They do this in 2 different ways:

They manipulate interest rates to create "boom-bust" cycles which always work out to the advantage of the hidden elite "insiders". . .

as they know exactly when our economy will boom, and when it will bust.

They increase the money supply by "creating" money through the incredibly lucrative "sweet heart" deal

they've had with the U.S. government, ever since the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 was signed into law.

Accordingly, when the U.S. Government needs money, they go to the Fed to borrow the money. The Fed calls the Treasury and asks them to print x amount of Federal Reserve Notes (FRN) in units of one hundred dollars. The Treasury charges the Fed 2.3 cents for each note. The Fed then lends that money to the government at face value plus interest. The government has to create a bond for the loan amount as security for the loan.

Now the government owes the private ownership of the Fed the face value of the bonds plus interest. In other words, the Fed earns interest by "loaning" that money to the U.S. government. Imagine that... they earn interest by loaning money which is not even theirs to loan...

which they just created out of thin air.

So essentially every bill they "create" has a debt associated to it, and if the debt is not paid, what do you think they do ?

That's right. They create more Federal Reserve Notes so they can loan more to the government (actually exchange for U.S. bonds)

in order to pay off the debt, thereby growing the national debt even more.

This is what we refer to as a debt monetary system. In other words, our currency has a debt attached to it before we ever spend any of it. We can never get out of debt because it is a self propagating, vicious cycle, that will ultimately end with the complete destruction of our currency and bankruptcy of our nation.

They can NOT be audited and do NOT answer to the President or anyone for that matter. The president appoints the Board of Governors but has no control over their secret activities. Congress knows nothing of the conversations, plans, and actions taken in concert with other central banks. We get less and less information regarding the money supply each year, especially now that M3 is no longer reported.

Not only is the Fed exempt from tax, but 100% of the income tax that Americans pay, goes right to the Fed to pay off this debt, which they perpetually create. It is no coincidence that the Federal Income tax law was enacted in the same year as the Federal Reserve Act. It was needed to finance this scam. Prior to this, the U.S prospered and the government paid it's bills with out needing revenue from income tax. But that all ended with the enactment of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913. From that point forward, income tax was required to pay for the debt owed to the Fed for interest on the money they create and loan out to the U.S. government. This is just beyond insanity.

"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties that standing armies"

-Thomas Jefferson

In accordance with Thomas Jefferson's views, Article 1, Section 8 of the US Constitution specifically says that Congress is the only body that can "coin money and regulate the value thereof." The US Constitution has never been amended to allow anyone other than Congress to coin and regulate currency.

http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/duke/120308

Can somebody please explain to me, why this isnt on the news being blown up? Im not racist, but this is rediculous. You cant say anything bad about blacks in america, otherwise, your deemed a racist. But when a black does something against a white person, its thrown under the rug. Its not equal rights unless everybody has the SAME rights. So why are we blowing up this "White-hispanic" shot a "black" kid thing, when nothing is said on the news about 2 black teens dousing a white kid in gasoline and setting him on fire? Does anybody else see this?? How come anything negative towards blacks by whites is deemed racist, but vice-versa, its acceptable? Can somebody please elaborate?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=10t89kX8k7U

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UDChEDnISOw&feature...

Did any of you have any idea? What happened to our democracy? This isnt right. Ron Paul HAS more support then some of you may believe. This is just so blatant

16 trillion dollars in debt, and nobody has a solid way out, except for Ron Paul. What makes people think we can just keep borrowing money and everything will be just dandy? Bush AND Obama, and so on and so forth, have contributed to this factor. There will be a point in time, where we WONT be able to afford the interest on the debt, so what would happen then? We lost our triple A credit rating, and its likely to go down again as long as we continue the habits we have today. So this is what I want to ask everybody. Why not Ron Paul? Why are people praising Obama or anybody for that matter, that doesnt seem to understand this fact? Why is there little concern over this? Why is this pushed to the side and not taken into consideration as a major issue? Does anybody actually have a plan, or know what should be cut if you dont agree with Ron Paul?

Ron Paul, if he cant win the nomination by popular vote, plans to go to the republican national convention to tackle the front-runner in a floor fight to sway the delegates to his side. This is an unconventional way of trying to win the nomination, but he plans on having many of his supporters there at the convention to cheer him and his cause on to help sway the minds of republicans. Its possible that the delegates he didnt win by popular vote actually support Paul. Please provide a logical answer as to why he may, or may not be able to win the nomination this way. Personally, im not sure. But it would be interesting, as some republicans have swayed to his side during his campaign, and has recieved more endoresments then expected

This deck list is for the upcoming structure deck "Dragons Collide". This is a rough draft. No I do not have Tour Guide. I have tested this on dueling network with great sucess, but dueling network isnt the greatest when it comes to shuffling and the actual reality of the deck. Until I actually have it in my hands, its only a test deck. Any other suggestions are appreciated

Monsters (22)

x1 BLS

x1 Chaos Sorcerer

x3 Lightpulsar Dragon

x3 Darkflare Dragon

x3 Red Eyes Darkness Metal Dragon

x3 Eclipse Wyvern

x2 Ehren, Lightsworn Monk

x2 Ryko, Lightsworn Hunter

x1 Lyla, Lightsworn Sorceress

x1 Jain, Lightsworn Paladin

x1 Summoner Monk

x1 Blackwing, Gale the Whirlwind

Spells (11)

x1 Monster Reborn

x1 Dark Hole

x2 Gold Sarcophagus

x1 Charge of the Light Brigade

x2 Mystical Space Typhoon

x1 Future Fusion

x1 Foolish Burial

x1 Reasoning

x1 Monster Gate

Traps (7)

x2 Solemn Warning

x2 Bottomless Trap Hole

x1 Solemn Judgment

x1 Mirror Force

x1 Torrential Tribute

EXTRA DECK

x2 Stardust Dragon

x1 Black Rose Dragon

x1 Red Dragon Archfiend

x1 Five Headed Dragon

x2 Number 39: Utopia

x1 Tiras, Keeper of Genesis

x1 Gaia Knight, Force of the Earth

Monsters(19)

x3 Grapha, Dragon Lord of Dark World

x3 Snoww, Unlight of Dark World

x3 Broww, Huntsman of Dark World

x3 Goldd, Wu-Lord of Dark World

x3 Sillva, Warlord of Dark World

x2 Beiige, Vanguard of Dark World

x1 Bronn, Mad King of Dark World

x1 Morphing Jar

Spells(14)

x3 Gates of Dark World

x3 Dark World Dealings

x2 Dark World Lightning

x1 Card Destruction

x1 Cheerful Coffin

x1 Dark Hole

x1 Foolish Burial

x1 Heavy Storm

x1 Reload

Traps(7)

x3 Skill Drain

x1 Solemn Judgement

x1 Torrential Tribute

x1 Mirror Force

x1 Dark Bribe

No I do not have fabled ravens. If I did, they would go in there

The only reason im asking is because what im told, the US cannot use asian cards. Please elaborate and provide source or damn good reasoning

Monsters [ 16 ]

x3 GK spy

x3 GK recruiter

x3 GK commandant

x3 GK descendant

x1 GK assailant

x1 Blackwing - Gale the Whirlwind

x1 Malefic Stardust Dragon

x1 Caius the Shadow Monarch

Spells [ 16 ]

x3 Necrovalley

x2 GK Stele

x2 Royal Tribute

x2 Wonder Wand

x2 Pot of Duality

x2 Smashing Ground

x2 MST

x1 Dark Hole

Traps [ 8 ]

x2 Bottomless Trap Hole

x1 Solemn Judgement

x1 Mirror Force

x1 Torrential Tribute

x1 Seven Tools of the Bandit

x2 Compulsory Evacuation Device

Extra Deck

x2 Stardust Dragon

x1 Arcanite Magician

x1 Black Rose Dragon

Side Deck

x3 Warrior Elimination

x2 Rite of Spirit

x1 Thunder King Rai oh

x3 Light Imprisoning Mirror

x3 Shadow Imprisoning Mirror

x1 Lightning Vortex

x1 Puppet Plant

x1 Malefic Stardust Dragon

No stupid questions about gale. He is to get arcanite magician out. I dont need a long drawnout opinion about what you think I should put in here, because I dont give a damn. I just want a simple rating. Thank you

Provided you have the life points of course