Did Sarah Palin or her daughter give birth to the youngest baby in the family?

It has been rumored that Sarah is not actually the mother of the youngest baby and the speculation is that her teenaged daughter is the actual mother and she covered it up. Yes the teenaged daughter that is currently pregnant is the one under suspicion. What do you think?

Anonymous2008-11-06T04:54:38Z

Favorite Answer

This is a very interesting question, and it is amazing that Sarah Palin's bizarre behaviour during her alleged recent pregnancy was never investigated.

By the way, for all those people who say 'do the math' with regard to the pregnances within the Palin family, we can't do the math when the numbers have been provided by the Palins! They have said Bristol is 'about' 5 months into her pregnancy. Want to bet she conveniently goes into seclusion fairly soon and the date of her (next) baby's birth is never conclusively established?

And for all those who say this is no one's business but the Palins, that is absolute RUBBISH. Of course it is the electorate's business if Sarah Palin is a liar. What a shame that this was never properly investigated by the media.

Oh well, at least they lost, and Sarah and her bizarre family can go back to Wasilla where they belong.

Anonymous2008-11-06T02:07:18Z

I think that people need to stop gossiping about things that they don't know.

If this was a fact, it would have been all over the news.I think it would make more sense that Sarah is the mother being that the older you are, the higher the risks of a chromosome deformity (being that the young lad has down syndrome) but who knows.

Anonymous2008-11-06T02:08:50Z

Why does it matter? Even if Brystol was the one who carried Trig, I find it amazing Sarah Palin would protect her daughter in that way. It's not true anyway. Brystol would have gotten pregnant again the day Trig was born to be this far along in another pregnancy. It's not true.

Lalala (:2008-11-06T01:59:10Z

well if you do the math it's not possible.
when her daughter was 5 months along, sarah's baby was only 4 months old.
what does it matter anyway?

This isn't a question to be asked in this section.
Plus people should just leave her family alone.. how would you like it if people you didn't know were talking about your children online and everywhere else?

avonmom2008-11-06T02:32:00Z

I think it was already established that bristol would have had to get pregnant within a week of delivering if that baby was hers. I think sarah is the mother.

Show more answers (4)