What if the 2001-2002 Bulls had stayed together?

Question

http://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/CHI/2002.html

By 2007 and 2008 they would have been something special, I think.  

BQ: Do you think all this trading and free agency, like they're playing musical teams with the players, is good for the fans, or would you rather see teams stick together and see what they can become?

Greekniko · Accepted Answer

I think they would have been a border line playoff team b/c there is really no superstar on that roster. Guys like Artest, Crawford, Chandler are good role players and it would make for a decent team if they'd stuck together but I don't see them being nearly as good as this Bulls team.

BQ : I think it's good for the casual fan. It excites people to see things like LeBron and Bosh going to Miami, Melo to NY, and the big three in Boston, etc.. It draws attention. Personally I like it when teams stay together for a long time and progress through the years.

dangelo h · Answer

They probably would of been a decent good playoff team.
BQ:I think it is like musical teams,I guess it is good for the fans,and usually if you keep the same team together,it sometimes doesn't workout.

Anonymous · Answer

WHY?? LIVE IN PAST? THIS BULLS TEAM WILL MAKE FINALS VS LAKERS

What if the 2001-2002 Bulls had stayed together?

Related Questions

Trending Questions