Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

If we do habve a woman President...?

Condeleeza or Hillary? And why. I go for Condeleeza, myself.

I have respect for the way she presents herself, her knowledge, and she gives me a better sense of stability.

My thoughts about Hillary are tainted by her involvements with her husband, and her inability to convey anything but her own agenda.

I am NOT criticizing, merely stating a preference, and I listed only 2 choices.

Update:

Sorry about the type-o

8 Answers

Relevance
  • 2 decades ago
    Favorite Answer

    I prefer Hillary back in the White House. She has an agenda, makes it clear, and is tough as nails.

    She got absolutely shafted during the health insurance hearings. It was shameful. I thought she was on the right track at the time. She assumed that since state run health care in a couple of U.S. states was running so nicely that this was probably a smart model to follow. But, she hadn't made any decisions, she just wanted a debate on the matter.

    Since she is gone health care cost of started to sky rocket again. She'll tame that beast to some degree, I think.

    But, the main reason I would want the Clinton's back in the White House is because of how well respected they are around the world. Right now we need the help of others and we aren't getting it.

    Condie is great, but not ready to be President, and she doesn't want it.

  • 2 decades ago

    Given the two choices, I'd go with Hillary Clinton. She's brilliant and has a deep sense of social concern. Senator Clinton has been an excellent Senator & advocate for her constituents here in New York State. While Dr. Rice is brilliant, too--(no doubt about that!) I don't feel confident in her ability or desire to advocate for her constituents. So Hillary, to me would be a much better choice.

  • 2 decades ago

    well, i'm really not a hillary fan. on the other hand, what do we really know about condeleeza rice? She doesnt make policy, she carries out the presidents. She seems nice enough, but i've never heard her speak on most topics that concern americans today.

  • Anonymous
    2 decades ago

    I am a friend of Hillary, she is a smart, successful senator from New York. She has serve them well. She is not afraid to stand up for what she believes in. She would have one of the best advisers in the world, the last great President, Bill. For more information

    www.friendsofhillary.com

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Helper
    Lv 4
    2 decades ago

    Both bad choices. I would have to listen to debates and platforms and them I might be able to choose a lesser of two evils, but more than likely (and my opinion right now) is I'd have to vote for a 3rd party candidate or write-in.

  • 2 decades ago

    rice for war and hilary for cosmetics,heck why not put winfrey in there,or ellen degeneris,it is all a show,female presidents list is very short,and trice is only option.heck were already at war,even she wont make change,all change is convoluted and takes 5 to 7 terms or more,and then little is seen.

  • 2 decades ago

    Condi. She's a very smart and capable woman who is both educated and calm. Unfortunately, it looks like she doesn't want to run for President.

    Hillary is an obnoxious, rude woman. What's more, she is self serving and extremely political.

  • Anonymous
    2 decades ago

    Condeleeza no because that hair style is ****** and hilary is bills wife.....

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.