Should Bush be removed from office for election robbery?

He should be impeached for everything that he has done.

He stole both elections. That is fact, not conspiracy. You are 100% right! This Bush administration is an evil regime that needs to brought to justice! I don't how these repubs can defend this guy! What happened to democracy? Enron helped to steal the first election and Jeb played a part in both. But the real dirty money came from Haliburton. Thanks to Rollingstone for printing that article and to you for posting this Q.

IMPEACH DUBYA 2006!

I voted Kerry, but I am a fair-minded person, and so here's my take:

-The people who received late ballots in Ohio weren't all Democrats. For all we know, most of them (likely military) may have voted for George W. Bush.

-Votes that are thrown out because of malfunctioning equipment or because they are cast erroneously should never be counted in the first place (check out the Equal Protection clause of the 14th Amendment). Also, there is no inherent link between faulty, thrown-out votes and being a Democrat or Republican. Again, for all we know the votes were Republican. Why are all erroneous or thrown-out votes Democrat in the first place? And you can apply this logic to Kerry blue states as well. For all we know, Republican votes were thrown out in many large metropolitan areas. Why not do an analysis of those votes- if you are so fair-minded?

-What you fail to mention is that in a number of Kerry states, the vote was much closer than in Ohio (including states like Michigan and Pennsylvania). Using the same Ohio logic (i.e. that a close vote necessitates a recount) we should have recounted Kerry's wins in the Great Lakes states and Pennsylvania- which accounted for many more electoral votes than Ohio. Why is it that Democrats tend to think that a narrow margin is only "invalid" when the Republican wins but not when the Democrat wins? Maybe Kerry shouldn't have won Pennsylvania or Michigan or Wisconsin.

-Historically, there have always been irregularities in elections. The late Mayor Daley of Chicago is believed to have thrown out thousands of Chicago, Illinois votes during the 1960 election. In the case of Daley's fraud, the documentaive proof was substantial. Kennedy likely won, in large measure, owing to Daley's shenanigans. How ironic that a Kennedy is writing this article.

Before you jump into the "Bush stole the election" bandwagon, try to look at all of the facts. Try to look at the fact that votes that are thrown out or never counted don't line up neatly along political lines. And if some Republicans did throw out votes, then that should be investigated. But if you do investigate Republican fraud, the certainly you should investigate Democrat fraud, especially in states that ended up going to Kerry with much narrower margins than Ohio.

Among other things, let's make a list,

1-Lying to take America to War in Iraq

2-Continuing to lie about the war in Iraq

3-War Crimes

4-Dereliction of Duty

5-Treachery

6-Illegal Wiretapping

7-Cavorting with the Enemy Vicente

8-Giving his brain to Karl Rove

9-Trying to be a Cowboy instead of the President

10-

11-

12-

13-

14-

15-

16-

17-

18-

19-

20- All the above and the crimes we don't know about

YET!

DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANYTHING TO ADD?

What a crock. The DNC report on Ohio is directly contradictory to the claims of accuracy on the exit polls. The voting followed the same pattern as the mid-term election, per the DNC report.

The voter registry issues in Ohio were, as usual, found in Democrat voting areas, with Democrat directors of elections. Typical Democrat incompetence.

The facts do not support the spittle-flecked conclusion.

There.

Well me personally I am an independant and if this is true then a formal investigation needs to be conducted. But I agree with Eli2359 with his answer it is Rolling Stone. And I really didnt see any evidence or proof, just someone saying what happened....how about pictures, interviews and such

Actually it should be investigated by a third party. A group of people like a grand jury and if found to be true then yes he should be removed from office along with his vice president. Speaker of the house would be next in line to the presidency.

Here we go again another Florida. The left is always trying to prove something they can't.Why doesn't the left just give it up. I wonder what Al Gore would have done if 9/11 hapened on his watch. I know he would do nothing. He would have probally said "say your sorry and can't we all get along"

With the help of his brother, the governor of Florida, and his father's appointments to the Supreme Court, bush became President after losing by over 500,000 votes.

this was the first time .... Bush Cheated Worse President ever~!

Imagine having the Devil run your country, i feel sorry for all Americans. Bush is not a president you can be proud of. And that is nothing to do with the war, he is just an immoral man.

I could fabricate a pretty convicing article saying basically anything I want (both sides usually do...). Don't believe what you hear in Rolling Stone... I don't think they can be taken seriously.

I voted Kerry, yet i'm a honest-minded man or woman, and so right this is my take: -the individuals who gained previous due ballots in Ohio weren't all Democrats. For all all of us comprehend, maximum of them (possibly protection rigidity) would have voted for George W. Bush. -Votes that are thrown out because of the fact of malfunctioning kit or because of the fact they are solid erroneously could in no way remember interior the 1st place (inspect the equivalent secure practices clause of the 14th modification). additionally, there is not any inherent hyperlink between defective, thrown-out votes and being a Democrat or Republican. lower back, for all all of us comprehend the votes have been Republican. Why are all faulty or thrown-out votes Democrat interior the 1st place? and you will prepare this good judgment to Kerry blue states besides. For all all of us comprehend, Republican votes have been thrown out in many super metropolitan areas. Why no longer do an diagnosis of those votes- in case you're so honest-minded? -What you fail to show is that in the time of particularly some Kerry states, the vote replaced into plenty nearer than in Ohio (inclusive of states like Michigan and Pennsylvania). utilising the comparable Ohio good judgment (i.e. that an extensive vote necessitates a recount) we could constantly have known Kerry's wins interior the super Lakes states and Pennsylvania- which accounted for many extra electoral votes than Ohio. Why is it that Democrats tend to think of that a slender margin is merely "invalid" while the Republican wins yet no longer while the Democrat wins? in step with hazard Kerry wouldn't have gained Pennsylvania or Michigan or Wisconsin. -traditionally, there have constantly been irregularities in elections. The previous due Mayor Daley of Chicago is concept to have thrown out hundreds of Chicago, Illinois votes in the time of the 1960 election. interior the case of Daley's fraud, the documentaive data replaced into considerable. Kennedy possibly gained, in super degree, thank you to Daley's shenanigans. How ironic that a Kennedy is penning this text. in the previous you leap into the "Bush stole the election" bandwagon, attempt to look in any respect the data. attempt to look on the very undeniable fact that votes that are thrown out or in no way counted do no longer line up well alongside political strains. And if some Republicans did throw out votes, then which could be investigated. yet once you do inspect Republican fraud, the easily you could inspect Democrat fraud, tremendously in states that ended up going to Kerry with plenty narrower margins than Ohio.