Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
a Q to the "believers": Y every time the Arabs are on the loosing end, they call 4 an "IMMEDIATE CEASEFIRE"?
1948:jordan, the palestinians, lebanon, egypt. syria, iraq (run away without signing the agreement)
1956: egypt and the palastinians of gaza.
1967: egypt, jordan, syria, the palastinians
1973: egypt, syria, iraq (run away from the golan)
1985: lebanon
2006: lebanon
mor response from the ones that call themselvs "belivers" please. ie; muslims 9if i need to feed them with a tea spoon)
"tere"
i think you need to learen some history
19 Answers
- 1 decade agoFavorite Answer
Hey tough guy, I hope it's okay for a non-Arab/non-Muslim to answer your Q.
Your question is flawed as well as misleading! The international community is urging a cease fire; Arabs and non-Arabs alike! Believe it or not, many Israelis are among those that are seeking a cessation of hostilities! Prudence demands the necessity of a cease-fire if a resolution is ever to be achieved. I do hope that you agree that resolving this crisis would better serve us than perpetuating it!
Furthermore, are the Arabs really on the losing end ? I do agree that Israel was justified in it's initial response. However, Hezbollah's position has been, and will continue to be, strengthened by a protracted war. This will only serve and reinforce the radical elements in the region.
So, I ask you, who is really on the losing end?
Asking for a cease-fire during any conflict, regardless of the location or the participants, is the approach that is both proper and civilized.
By the way, the 1st invasion of Lebanon was 1982, not '85! Also, for what it's worth, if it were not for U.S. involvement in '56 as well as '73, it is quite possible that Israel would have capitulated; especially '73! It is a well known fact that the Israeli defense minister wept and pleaded for an Israeli surrender!
I suggest that you examine the facts more closely in the future.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
Because that's how they fight.
Instigate a war.
. Once the war is well underway and you are in the process of having your *** handed to you... get a few world powers to force your western opponent into a cease fire.
. Whatever you do, don't surrender or submit to any terms dictated by your enemy. That would ruin everything! All you have to do is wait it out and eventually the world will become sickened at what is being done to your soldiers and civilian population... and will force a truce.
. Once a truce has been called you can resume your intransigence (which probably caused the conflict in the first place), and even declare victory as your opponent leaves the field of battle
Source(s): Fred the dog ~¶¶ö - mrcricket1932Lv 61 decade ago
This is directed to your antagonist..
I have been around for a few years.. I have never seen the USA getting involved in any conflict alongside Israel...They did send their spy plane over the battle field and showed the armament of both sides... then took those pics to all countries involved.. that is what caused the cessation of hostilities.. Shortly after that, (in Carter's time) there was a peace accord between Egypt and Israel.
If you are going to state information as fact, make sure it is accurate.
- 1 decade ago
first of all, the arabic leader are just american agents, they never do what ppl want
in the otherside,
in the past in wars, uk and usa used to sell arabic countries inoperative weapons and GAVE israel a real good weapons.
isnt that cheating?
dont believe what israeli media is telling you in CCN and othes, cuz arabic leader have SOLD the wars and golan and all palestine
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- 1 decade ago
calls for cease fires come from the modern repository of anti-semitism, the UN and they allow for:
The terrorists to rebuild and re-arm
The UN to bask in the glow of their percieved power while ignoring the utter failure each treaty has been. They collectively hate Israel and sympathize with hezbollah and hamas, this alone is reason enough to disband the UN.
- Mr. Been thereLv 41 decade ago
Why are you asking the question when you have already printed the answer.
No matter how you wrap and shake the Tonga, in the end it's character that counts.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
If you remember believers are Christians not Muslims. We do not believe in murdering teen agers for crimes of chastity. We basically believe in love and peace. We definitely believe in Jesus and the Holy Spirit and God. We believe in helping the helpless, but we believe in our country too. We Christians in America basically believe for God and Country. Just in that order.
- GEN GamerLv 41 decade ago
because they want to save face
during the war of independence for israel, 40 arab tribesman attcaked a kibbutzim in israel. all were slaughtered and only 1 israeli lost their lives
and yet, in order to save face,they told eceryone it was a splebdid victory
these peple are like cockroachess (terrorists i mean), u kill them yet they keep coming back for more
- 1 decade ago
for time, under the ruse of diplomacy, to regroup or receive shipments from their buddies! Iran is doing it now, stalling to make more nukes!