Social Programs, which one would you support?

Absolutely education, as it's the key that allows anything close to equal access to the nebulous concept of the American dream.

I don't like #6 because that essentially throws away the government as one essential tool we use to deal with issues that affect us all. I don't have any kids receiving public education, but I'm happy to pay taxes for it because it is so essential to the economy, and to my safety, as it also prevents crime. But, along those same lines, I believe that the others are also issues that affect us all.

Of course, implicit within the question is the notion that the nation can't afford to fund all those things, and I think this is a flawed assumption. Half of all discretionary spending goes to the military, and our military spending is equal to that of the rest of the world combined. I think we could safely shift money away from that without in any way endangering our security. Plus there's the 12% or so that goes to paying interest on the national debt.

Finally, it could easily be suggested that something like national health care would quickly pay for itself by promoting business (that would no longer be responsible to insure employees), shifting treatment from cures (very expensive) to the inexpensive prevention that comes with frequent care, and by greater efficiency. It's popular to denigrate the efficiency of all things governmental, but Medicare is actually far more efficient than any private insurer, devoting only about 5% of its money to administration as compared with something like 20% for private companies.

Many similar arguments could be made for the other services.

So, while within the constraints of the question I'd select education, I think all the services mentioned are not only affordable, but could even be profitable.

After all, how much benefit is each of us really receiving for a billion dollar stealth bomber, when we're facing people armed with knives and hand grenades?

By the way, thanks for helping to elevate the tone of this forum. I disagree with your positions sometimes, but I like that you don't resort to the uninformative name-calling that seems so ubiquitous, and actually challenge people to think seriously about serious issues.

None of the above.

I will give some credance to the retirement pay, after 65. However even then it depends how much the individual paid into it.

What you are implicating is a socialist program that in actual practice has a negative effect. It creates, for a lack of a better term a broad spectrum of laziness. which in effect does not allow the betterment of the individual, or the advancement of the village to prosper.

Socialized medicine would be a good thing it would appear, however there are stop gaps already in place, for starters Most people have insurance, some people pay thru the nose as we are all aware, but in our society, I think costs could be kept under control if we weren't such a litigous society. There is a lot to discuss on this matter but, at this point I can only say that I disagree w/ it. If I lost my job I would have a different take on the subject i'm sure.

As an added note I'll tell you a little secret, I don't agree with most of you have to say in this forum, but I do respect you for your intelligent approach.

have a good day!

I would go with number 1. If more people were educated, then the need for some of the other programs would diminish.

2. People should WORK to get health care

3. I dislike welfare and the sense of entitlement it fosters.

4. If you have a good job and work your whole life you should be able to save for your retirement. Don't spend every dollar you make and then expect the government to take care of you in your old age.

5. Disability insurance...

6. I am sick of paying so much in taxes. We have a 6 figure tax bill, 3 kids in college, and things we want to do. I shouldn't have to pay for LaToya's 10th kid. Flat tax...

#1

With a good education, you can get a better paying job with health insurance(2), a retirement plan (4), and long-term disability(5).

Give a man a fish, he eats for a day. Teach a man to fish, he eats for life.

Interestingly enough, the governor of our former state (MA) recently passed a bill giving every student in the top 25% of their class a four-year scholarship at any state college (and he's a Republican). It's nice to see the "other party" actually waking up and realizing that the key to bettering society is giving society a better education.

Well, of course # 1, education does lead to the possibility of all your other choices...no wait, I've heard of people who went to Yale and don't seem too bright to me ( *cough)'

Ok # 2 then, it's incredible how much we have to pay for insurance and heartbreaking when someone goes through so much pain because of no insurance...

but then again # 3 is equally as needed, although I do believe we have such program, somewhat ( a child shouldn't go hungry in the US, not with all the money we spend on ridiculous stuff)

but hey ! who's going to take care of me when I'm older....

ALright, I give up, it's impossible to choose.. I want it all. Does that make me a communist, a socialist or just plain dumb?

Utopia is such a tempting concept though ......

4 or 6.

Good question, a better one is how do we get our elected officials to ask these type of questions. (1) Free education is going to by far outweigh 99.9 % of any social economic programs I could possibly fathom. I think all the other choices would not be as big a problem as they are now had we higher education available as a country. I believe that individuals and families having the opportunity to further their education, they would in turn be able to provide themselves and their families with health care,nutritious food, they would earn more because of the level of education. That would allow them to contribute more to savings for retirement, or better care for disabled loved ones. I think ignorance is the root of most social economic problems, and if we could teach people at least how to support themselves financially by having a higher paying job that a degree could extend to them issues that we now know as problems could just be small anomalies

This question is relatively simple to answer. I'm surprised, however, at how many people opted for free education and free medical. I guess the country has turned into a selfish lot these days.

Of all the choices you listed, the most important is food stamps for the children of disadvantaged families. Of all the groups who benefit from your list of programs, it's these children who cannot fend for themselves. In most cases, hungry children are the victims of their parents mistakes and misfortunes. These children are the responsibility of us all. In a child's life there is always hope of the future.

Shame on the rest of you for thinking only of yourselves.

1)We already have free education.

2)Poor people already have free health-care

3)Poor people already have stamps for buying food for children.

4)We have to work at least 20 years more to get retirement pay

5)We already have disability pay

6)Hope it will never happen. It’s not a problem to pay tax to help poorest people. Human being has more value than money.

Well, I think I will stay here.

(1)

My husband works hard for his money, and it hurts every time we look at the check to see how much was taken out in taxes.

We should get to keep the money we earn. I'd rather get a bill in the mail for my school taxes though, instead of pay some crazy high tuition.