Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Creationist Fossil Challenge: Which of these are apes? Which are human?
I asked this question in biology, and got no creationist answers...so maybe this is a better forum?
According to creationists, apes and humans are different "kinds". At this link there is a picture of 14 skulls...1 is a modern ape, 1 is a modern human skull. What are the other skulls - ape, or human? How do you draw the line?
Some additional details:
Sample "H" is known to have used stone tools, "primarily hand axes and cleavers".
http://www.mnh.si.edu/anthro/humanorigins/ha/erg.h...
Does that change your view?
14 Answers
- Anonymous1 decade agoFavorite Answer
they'r all apes. Flail my flesh and you will find an ape underneath. This then is the modern version: homo sapien.
- 1 decade ago
Most of them aren't complete enough for me (as a non-bone man) to tell the difference. I'm sure an expert would give a better answer, but for the ones where there is enough bone mass to tell:
A=ape
B=ape
C=ape
D=ape
H=ape
I=ape
J=ape
L is hard to tell, because I'm not sure if the discollored sections are filled in or of those are actually part of the bone mass.
M and N are both human, and if I (as a non-bone man) were to guess, I would guess that N is an Asiatic and M is African.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
I see 14 skulls. Some could be human. Some could be ape. A common designer is just as good of a rational as a common origin in this sense.
Think of it this way. If you see one building and you know the architect. You see a similar building, is it not reasonable to assume they might were created by the same person? Commonalities among species is just as much of an argument for creationism as it is for evolution. It just depends on how you interpret the observations.
- Anonymous4 years ago
the different skulls are neither modern ape nor modern guy. they are our precursors. Evolution would not state that guy got here from apes, it states that in some unspecified time sooner or later some time previous, we shared a effortless ancestor. Skulls are extra complicated than they look. they are separated into many diverse areas, are available in diverse sizes w/ diverse sized mind circumstances, and so on. those are a number of the valuable houses that motives them to be categorized as diverse species. in accordance to the position the skulls were discovered, researchers can be sure an approximate age of the skulls. once you line them up so as of age, you will see that a progression of valuable houses in the direction of modern guy.
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- kurticus1024Lv 71 decade ago
I think only Homo Sapiens are human, maybe 4 million years old max. Neanderthals are not, Australopithecus is not, From Lucy, the earliest know human fossil, read some of the books by Loius Leakey maybe
Source(s): opinion - EllyLv 51 decade ago
This website should be good to show that evolution is the truth, but you know creationists are not very sensible people and they reject every evidence that is shown to them, because they think they must trust the Bible more than their own senses. This is what I found out in every discussion I had regarding these matters.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
I draw the line between apes and humans.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
Haiku
Fossils are studied
Trying to word this nicely
Not in Genesis!
- Anonymous1 decade ago
What does it matter....God created man apart from the ape. That is the plain and simple truth, who cares about fossils.