Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

How can I prove that this function is differentiable at x = 1?

It's a piecewise polynomial function:

f(x) = x^2 + 1 if x <= 1 and

f(x) = 2x if x > 1

It's a parabola that turns into a line. It doesn't have any gaps or corners. The limit of f(x) as x approaches 1 is 2, and the limit of f'(x) as x approaches 1 is 2.

This was a problem on a test, but I my calculus teacher took points off because she says that the function is not differentiable at x = 1. I need to formally prove that this function is differentiable at x = 1, so I can get those points back.

Thanks in advance!

2 Answers

Relevance
  • Broden
    Lv 4
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    The first condition for a function to be differentiable in a point x is that the function is continuous at that point.

    it's easy to prove the function is continuous at x=1

    because:

    Lim f(x)=Lim(x^2 + 1)= 2 for x going to 1 from left (1-)

    Lim f(x)=Lim(2x)=2 for x going to 1 from right (1+)

    We have now proved that the function is continuous at x=1

    We will look at f' at x=1

    f'(x)=2x ; x<=1

    f'(x)=2 ; x>1

    the function is differentiable in a point x=a if and only if, the function is continuous and f' exist and has the same value when x goes to point x=a from left and right

    Lim f'(x)=2 for x going to x=1 from left (1-)

    Lim f'(x)=2 for x going to x=1 from right (1+)

    now we have proven that the function is differentiable at x=1

  • vogt
    Lv 4
    4 years ago

    properly, for any actual function f(f(x)) = e^-x + a million, f would be a million-a million. assume f isn't a million-a million, then there are 2 distinctive reals x,y such that f(x)=f(y), which shows that f(f(x)) = f(f(y)). => e^-x + a million = e^-y + a million => e^-x = e^-y => -x=-y so as that x=y, a contradiction. d/dx f(f(x)) = -e^-x < 0 for all x additionally, d/dx f(f(x)) = f'(f(x)) * f'(x). Now, if f is a a million-a million function and differentiable, then it is non-provide up and subsequently the two weakly increasing or weakly reducing. Case a million: assume it is weakly increasing (f'(x) >= 0 for all x): d/dx f(f(x)) = f'(f(x)) * f'(x) is the manufactured from 2 nonnegative numbers and subsequently nonnegative. yet it is a contradiction, by way of fact the derivative is destructive everywhere. Case 2: assume it is weakly reducing (f'(x) <= 0 for all x): resembling above, the place the manufactured from 2 such numbers shows that the derivative ought to be nonnegative. =><=. subsequently no such differentiable function exists. ------- surely, i think of we are able to weaken the argument interior the 2d section slightly, showing that no such non-provide up function exists. although, i don't be attentive to on the topic of the discontinuous ones. (and my gut feeling is that it would ought to be discontinuous everywhere, yet I surely have no longer something to decrease back that up)

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.