Technically speaking on the Royal Family...?

The Royals are parasites - they have a choice to be a drain on the taxpayer and they choose to do it. Many on welfare have no choice. Who is the more moral? My money's not with the Royals.

The difference between any rich family and a welfare family is that the rich family has a history of an ancestor or two who laid down a foundation for them so generations after them did not have to work like the normal person. A family on welfare are either people who don't want to work, or have trouble finding long term work. The royal families of the world are not welfare people, they are the rulers and/or social influences on their kingdoms and elsewhere.

The British Royal Family brings alot of of tourist revenue to the UK, as well as serve as ambassadors of good will throughout the world. Prince Charles champions causes such as historical preservation and environmental concerns. So the monarchy is not all bad.

According to modern moral standards Royal people are very likely considered as Second Generation of Neanderthals. Moreover fading cultural and consciousness core that losing its uses to corporate culture and mind.

france is the most visited country on earth ( the republic of france)

and edinburgh is no.1 tourists attraction in britain after london.

are you telling me the brits are so devoid of culture we need a f*cking embarressment like the royals to attract tourists BOLLOCKS.

The royal family do nothing they just host dinners and open supermarket centres

It is different because of the high opinion that the masses have traditionally held of the Windsors.

Lets face it if they lived on an estate Big ears would be sectioned and the Kids be ASBOed, as for Camel A well......

Did you know the queen is the richest person in the world.