Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Is This a Precedent? Is This Just Another Step Toward the Government Controling Our Lives?

I'm pretty sure this type of law will catch on everywhere. Granted, people should not eat trans-fat, but is the government now telling us what we can and cannot eat? Is this going too far?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061205/ap_on_he_me/di...

12 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    Well thats just lovely. People now have such a lack of self control and are getting so fat the government has to cut them off at the trough.

  • 1 decade ago

    It's a public health issue. We all pay for the health problems of people who eat too much fatty food, just as we all pay for the health problems of smokers. So it is everyone's business.

    And really, is it any different from the government putting up traffic lights, instead of just letting people decide for themselves when it is safe to cross the intersection? Or making child proof bottles for dangerous substances? Or regulating drugs? Banning trans fats will save lives.

  • Mikira
    Lv 5
    1 decade ago

    There is nothing wrong with banning the use of trans fat usage in resteraunts. They feed people too much in the first place. I don't know if people realize how food portion sizes have increased in the last 100 years.

  • 1 decade ago

    I'd worry more about the government maintaining data bases on everything you do than about a local government restricting unhealthy fats. I suggest you get some perspective on what is or is not an important infringement of your rights. Drop the partisan drivel for a moment and think about it.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    I don't think that I would take the argument as far as you have, but it does seem overreaching for the City of New York to be defining what people may or may not eat in a restaurant.

  • pip
    Lv 7
    1 decade ago

    no, the government didn't make it illegal to eat these foods.. just illegal for people to sell them to you .... would the government be right in allowing a place to serve you rat poison just because it tastes good? (assumption about taste) ......... i would think not.. there would be no argument there.. high-trans fats are a poison and are killing millions of people in our nation.. obesity is already one of the leading causes of death and health care debt in this nation, and is expected according to current trends to overtake smoking as the number 1 within the next decade.

  • ?
    Lv 7
    1 decade ago

    They aren't saying that we can't eat it, they are regulating the oil that is being used. I have no problem with that. It states nothing about limitations on food.

    Source(s): JS
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    The shark was jumped years ago.

    In a few years everything you think do and say will be fed to you at breakfast.

  • 1 decade ago

    we have a representative government.

    we vote for them.

    get involved in politics so you can help make the laws.

    yes, corporate interests etc influence govt.

    but still that is just people, just "us" ...

    stockholders, employees, etc.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    It's the nanny state syndrome. They have obviously been talking to British politicians.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.