How we can provide employement to everybody?

We can't provide employment to everybody, especially those who don't want to work.

Follow the class structure that Indian society has followed for thousands of years. This wrong social philosophy being impregnated in the minds of various classes in society that some are "Children of a lesser God", has to be corrected first. Everyone is equal in society and not different because of the work they do. Then a farmer will remain a farmer, a cleaner will remain a cleaner and the aristocrats will govern well.

I think every community should use some of their money which is spent on high wages for leaders and create city/town employees that are specifically hired to clean, garden and in general beautify there public areas, neighborhoods, etc. Singapore has such an organized structure that most of the country is like Disney World. Everything is spit-spot and shiny. Lets pay some people to beautify our home. We certainly need more plants and trees to be planted and the money spent at nurseries would encourage their growth as well. (no pun intended) ! :O)

There is a theory in economics that holds that some "frictional" unemployment is inevitable, for example, people who have quit their job in disgust, those who are moving and have not found new employment yet, people who cannot work or are unwanted by employers, etc. Studies have found that this "frictional" unemployment rate is about 6%. If the unemployment rate is much below this, wages and inflation will rise as people demand more money for their services and managers substitute increased automation for labor. If the unemployment rate is much above this, then wages fall as workers accept lower wages for their work. This natural rate of unemployment is referred to as "full" employment.

To ensure everyone is employed, we would have to force everyone who has chosen to leave a position to stay, and to force the chronically unemployed to accept jobs and force companies to accept them as workers.

Since some frictional unemployment is inevitable, it is more useful to consider unemployment rates in excess of the "full employment" rate. There are a number of countries with this problem, and the usual source is either an unstable economy or labor market distortions caused by the government.

An example of an unstable economy would be America and Europe in the Great Depression. Governments tried to impose controls on the economy through price controls, import restrictions, and other methods, and the disruption of the market caused widespread unemployment.

Distortions of the labor markets occur when government takes too strong a hand in them. For example, France currently has a high unemployment rate due to the onerous regulations discouraging employers from laying off people and strong labor protections. These strong labor laws make employing people in these countries expensive relative to their value to employers, so they are less willing to hire them. Generous social benefits allow workers to survive this higher level of unemployment. The unemployment rate in these countries is higher than in nations with more competitive labor markets.

None of this is to say that government does not have a role to play in the labor markets or that laisse-faire capitalism would result in the best outcomes. There are externalities that companies are generally not required to pay (such as pollution or declines in employee health) that the companies are not forced to pay, which most people would agree are costs borne by society that would run rampant if not constrained by government intervention.

So in short, there is no way to provide employment to everyone without causing dramatic shifts in economy. Some unemployment is inevitable, and it is essential to the orderly function of the economy. To reduce unemployment, we should limit the role of government in the labor markets to protecting the health and welfare of the citizens and allow them to reach their own agreements with employers to work for what they are worth.

Mindless mechanisation is a bane in two ways. It leads to overproduction of goods and over exploitation of the natural resources. Secondly, it reduces the utility of human labour. Man's labour is rendered valueless. That is the direct fall out of industrial revolution, which made Karl Marx come out with a well researched book, i,e, Das Capital, on the effect of industries and its effect on the political and social institutions.

Gandhi went one step further. He was completely against the use of machines in production of good, wherever it can be sustained by human labour. Labour gives to man a means of making his living in an honourable manner. Hence, he was against the process of machination replacing the labour intensive industries. His 'Chackra' is symbol of man' hard labour and the dignity of labour. Unfortunately, we have not pursued with Gandhi's model and hence a large scale of unemployment. It is high time, we dismantled the old edifice for big industries and bring in labour intensive industries in place of capital intensive industries.

First and foremost in our country we must follow the saying "Industrialize or perish."

In my opinion the women of our country must prove that they are capable of working and supporting themselves. Then they must resign their jobs and help other capable men to get jobs. I feel that there are millions of extremely brilliant and very capable men among the unemployed youth. "Ablity is of little use without opportunity.". A man's job provides food, clothing, shelter, security, etc for the entire family. Also a man's job gives respect and social status to his wife.

Boy, oh boy ... that question ... that is purely no longer sturdy. Um, people who commit crimes are turning out to be a fee to society. they are inflicting the government to invest in police and attorneys, effective. they are additionally inflicting a fee to the persons they harm. a individual who robs you of $10.00 purely fee you a minimum of $10.00 plus the fee of a few time and of your decreased productiveness with the aid of fact now you have submit-stressful stress. Now, i might flow spend $10.00 to confirm undertaking impossible. And, have faith me, that's a waste of money. yet as quickly as I do it, i've got made the alternative. The movie became well worth $10.00 to me. If i'm getting robbed, i'm no longer making a call, i'm no longer spending that money with the aid of fact i prefer to. So the prospect fee is one hundred%. i might in no way use the money for that purpose willingly, I have been given no longer something for my money and now i don't have it to spend on a movie. Crime is uneconomical.

We shouldn't provide employment to everyone, because there needs to be a balance between the poor and rich.

We can provide employment to everybody by education.If we teach from learning time to work specialy in a area .job will provide when child will be young.

find a president who wants so stop building a bigger debt fighting over oil, oil thats destroying the earth by depleting the ozone layer so much that 33% of the polar ice caps melt and put people to work by rebuilding Lousianna