Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
What do you Bush bashing CNN watching Libs think of this?
http://www.cnn.com/US/9812/16/clinton.iraq.speech/ I know you will post without seeing this. You cannot defend the facts.
The fact remains Clinton knew the weapons were there. If not a WMD what killed 180,000 kurds ? we never found the gas. This proves it was hidden. That was pre 911 also. We cannot afford to turn our heads to intell anymore.
Hey Donie the reason Clinton didn't follow up was because he was afraid his poll numbers would drop. All Democrats are cowards. Bush did what had to be done. Thank God Gore wasn't in office on 911. We are at war with Radical Islam. They want you dead. Liberal policies make them hate Americans most. Peace is not possible with these whacko's.
11 Answers
- MikeGolfLv 71 decade agoFavorite Answer
If there were no WMDs in Iraq can somebody please explain the two 'live' mustard gas artillery shells my unit recovered (and I personally saw)?
- lolitaLv 44 years ago
no longer all liberals bash Bush for speaking to God. some human beings purely bash him for the hubris he reflects in questioning that he on my own is conscious what God needs accomplished. no longer all liberals are atheists. Many liberals are Christians. in case you do no longer understand that then, i'd say you particularly are not paying lots interest to the international around you, yet enable a handful of pundits inform you what to think of.
- 1 decade ago
Seriously, I thought this was cleared up by now. Saddam has had multiple weapons programs in history. There were ones we gave him in the 80s, ones he made in the 90s, and ones he supposedly made after 2000. The ones made in 98 were taken care of through pressure, sanctions, no-fly zones, inspections, and bombings. Clinton took care of these. Bush then explained that in the 2000s, Saddam started new weapons programs. These weapons were never found.
So your link has nothing to do with the current War, or the weapons we went to war over.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
Just because you always go off half ****** and put you measly two cents in when you don't know how to defend this President doesn't mean we all do.
As you may have noticed in the article
Troops were NOT put on the Ground and an Occupation DID NOT OCCUR
3218 troops did not die during these strikes.
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- eatmorec11h17no3Lv 61 decade ago
/me isn't a liberal..
Clinton murdered people over WMDs that still haven't been proven to exist in Iraq? Hang him high, too! Hell, sanctions on Iraq during Clinton's years killed half a million children, he's responsible for their deaths as well.
Just because Clinton murdered innocents in Iraq doesn't mean Bush has the authority or legitimate reasoning to do so..
- Carpe diemLv 61 decade ago
That explains why Bush didn't find any WMDS. Clinton took them out for him...
- Anonymous1 decade ago
Yawn
- Anonymous1 decade ago
Didn't Republicans cry foul when Clinton did that?
- Anonymous1 decade ago
And you Republicans responded with "Wag the Dog!!! Wag the Dog!!!" How short your memory is.
