Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Do you think that that dirtball at V-Tech would have got away with that if everyone had a gun on there side?

Yes or No personally I don't think that he would've

Update:

I'm not saying to arm everyone read the question I don't carry a gun and probably never will and no-moe-cho you're a putz

8 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    If everyone had a gun there would be more dead people nationwide.

  • 1 decade ago

    the concept is not give every idiot a gun, that would have had the effect of every clown wanting to be a hero, and a millin bullet holes everywhere, and guys dragging the shooter out to have him mounted and put over their fire place. it is make our kids into men who are responcable patriotic defenders of what isright, and should have the right to have one anywhere any time. ( but wouldnt) not outfitting clowns. it is a culture issue, not who should have athourity, with no responcability.

  • 1 decade ago

    i live in florida where we have the right to kill if we feel that our lives may be in danger. i personally cannot kill someone b/c i do not want blood quilt on my hands but i think that for many persons this is a good option if there personal beliefs will allow them to do the deed.

    to answer your question, the guy wouldnt have made it to the store to buy those guns!

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    No I think if people would think and care about people that obviously have a problem and need help maybe it would have been different. But whatever anyone says is only an opinion. Coulda, shoulda, woulda means nothing now.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    He would've never killed 33 people in one rampage had everbody been armed. Then again, he probably wouldn't have needed to kill everyone. He could've shot, like 2 people, and then 30 something other people would've been killed in friendly fire retaliation.

    Source(s): Common Sense.
  • 1 decade ago

    Arming everyone is not the answer. Another shooting would have happened much sooner.

  • 1 decade ago

    N O!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.