Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Seat Belt Law.. How did the UK Law stand in 1978?
Am restoring a 78 Jaguar XJ-S and there doesn't seem to be any belt mountings for the rear seat occupants. Does this car pre-date any lawful requirement for rear seatbelts?
10 Answers
- mal gLv 51 decade agoFavorite Answer
Compulsory fitting of rear seat belts in the U.K. came about in 1986, so your Jag. will not have mounting points.
Seat belt law :- 1965.Compulsory fitting of front seat belts.
1983. Compulsory wearing of seat belts for
driver and front seat passengers
1986.Compulsory fitting of rear seat belts.
1989.Compulsory wearing of seat belt for
rear child passengers.
1991. Compulsory wearing of seat belts for
all rear passengers.
Bit long winded I know, but 'Long story short' you don't need rear seat belts in your vehicle.
- InitialDaveLv 41 decade ago
Yes, it predates the requirement for rear seatbelts, and the general rule is "wear 'em if you got 'em", so it's ok to leave it like this if you want.
Personally, I'd say sacrificing a tiny bit of originality in concession to safety and fitting rear inertia-reels is a sensible idea: Fix some fairly substantial reinforcing plates where you want to mount them, it'll all be hidden once the car's back together, won't it?
- Anonymous1 decade ago
Yes not needed in rear until cars built in 199X something. Front fitment mandatory since 1967 but need not be used till 1983
Good luck with restoration ..fantastic motor but right pig to work on
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- ehingerLv 45 years ago
there is not any regulation in the united kingdom prohibiting little ones from traveling in the front seat of automobiles. notwithstanding they'd desire to have the suited newborn restraint (newborn seat, booster cushion, and so forth), only as they'd desire to have in the rear seat.
- jimbo_thedudeLv 41 decade ago
I think seat belts were fitted as an option in front seats, but you didn't have to wear them, and most cars didn't have back seat belts. I don't know if you'd have to put some in or not.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
If they were not fitted as standard, you do not have to have/use them. Your car should also be road tax exempt.
But, if they are fitted they must work, (this applies to everything seatbelts, lights, indicators, horn.)
That is only thing that the law is specific about regarding vehicles.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
ok!
i have restored many cars in my time........
Lotus Sunbeam (**** hot!)
Ford rs Mexico
Dolomite 2L 16v (sweet sweet car!)
Dolomite 1.5L HL (with over drive!)
NSU RO80 (best classic ever!)
at this time ('78)
rear seat belt where not factory fitted and where always advisory but not compulsory...
if you restore one today the same applies!
Source(s): however...use your common sense! would you want your passengers flying past you in an accident! my advice...fit them anyway!