Your noble and kind thoughts on this please..?

No. The secular will be brought to account for such actions at the white throne judgment -- just as you and I will for our various transgressions for which we have not repent and atoned for.

However, the blaspheme of a Prophet of Messenger of God is still below the level of 'unforgivable sin',

Ridiculing any sincere prophet or messenger of God is NOT justified.

However, only God can be blasphemed. Prophets and messengers are not God.

ALL sins can be forgiven; there is NO sin that God or Jesus or the Infinite Spirit can NOT forgive.

Peace and progress,

Brother Dave, a Jesusonian Christian Truthist

http://www.purechristians.org/ Gospel enlarging website,

proclaiming worldwide the True Religion

OF JESUS and ABOUT JESUS and IN JESUS

Come and share !

Justifiable...no. Forgivable, yes. The only unforgivable sin is blasphemy of the Holy Spirit.

Blasphemy is not justified. But if those who claim to be prophets or messengers of God are fake, then it is no blasphemy to point out that they are fake.

I think that it is very rude and childish to insult someone's religion, and I usually dismiss anyone who does so as a simpleton, but I also think that people have a right to say or write whatever they want.

I also believe that blasphemy does not include disbelief. I don't believe in the doctines of Christianity, and I'm not going to ridicule those who do believe in it, but I don't think that I am blaspheming anything if I give a detailed, critical analysis of their religion when asked to justify my disbelief...

I view blasphemy as an unprovoked, crude attack on someone's personal beliefs.

“I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it”

- Voltaire -

ll manner of sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven unto men: but the blasphemy against the Holy Ghost shall not be forgiven unto men. And whosoever speaketh a word against the Son of man, it shall be forgiven him: but whosoever speaketh against the Holy Ghost, it shall not be forgiven him, neither in this world, neither in the world to come".

St. Matthew 12: 31-32

Questioning the credibility of self anointed errand boys from God is not blasphemy, it's an obligation.

.

Neither justified nor unjustified. No evidence of a god to blasphemy.

Blasphemy?

Or a genuine search for truth by pointing out the flawed dogmas of others?

What you call "blasphemy" I call a college education.