Pros and Cons to National Health care.?

The post office. I would much rather use the US postal service than FedEx (I love overpriced inefficiency!)

authorities run well being care is tremendous in case you've were given functional human beings accountable. seem at Sweden or Iceland or Denmark or Canada to a lesser degree. It would not might want to be a gold plated equipment that grants each and every service, in spite of the indisputable fact that it is going to provide the basics. might want to electorate be finding out on between financial disaster and existence?

Government run health care is great if you've got competent people in charge. Look at Sweden or Iceland or Denmark or Canada to a lesser degree.

It doesn't have to be a gold plated system that provides every service, but it should provide the basics.

Should citizens be choosing between bankruptcy and life?

There are no pros to National Health Care. Why do you think so many people who can afford to pay the price come here for health care rather than their own country(Canada and others)?

If the government stayed out of healthcare the price could go down, ECONOMICS try learning a bit about it.

You will not get one coherent liberal answer on this. I was asking last night, and apparently health care is a right. The reasoning had something to do with the pursuit of happiness being impossible if you are sick. It would be funny if only they didn't vote.

You got it.

Pros for the national health care system: More poor people will die due to lack of adequate medical care; govenment will have more power; your records will become public; doctors will get richer.

Or is that the cons?

Pro: Everyone gets health care.

Con: Everyone gets crappy health care.