Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Apakah dasar ilmiah asosiasi psikiater amerika tahun 1973 menyatakan homoseksualitas=normal?

Artikel di http://www.narth.com/docs/annals.html menyatakan bahwa proses penormalan itu dilakukan dengan cara voting, berlangsung amat singkat, dan tanpa bukti ilmiah yang kuat. Dua makalah yang diajukan mengandung bias.

Bahkan duo penulis gay Marshall Kirk dan Hunter Madsen dalam bukunya After The Ball menandaskan bahwa keberhasilan perjuangan kaum gay dalam menekankan kenormalan homoseksualitas tidak ditunjang pada fakta ilmiah, namun lebih pada kemampuan memanipulasi emosi audiens melalui komunikasi di media massa (“…Our effect is achieved without reference to facts, logic, or proof...through repeated infralogical emotional conditioning, the person's beliefs can be altered whether he is conscious of the attack or not. …”) Bacalah http://www.narth.com/docs/socarides.html

3 Answers

Rating
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    yup bener banget soalnya negara amerika dah mengijinkan buat pasangan homoseks boleh menikahi sama jenis nya,,,,

  • 1 decade ago

    Kita sebagai kaum yang ' normal ' dalam arti berpasangan dengan lawan jenis akan menganggap bahwa SUKA ATAU BAHKAN CINTA SESAMA JENIS adalah hal yang ANEH.

    Pemikiran yang sama JUGA akan mengemuka pada diri mereka , bahwa KITA LAH yang bisa mencintai lawan jenis di anggap ANEH.

    Itulah demokrasi, hak asasi SETIAP UMAT MANUSIA untuk punya PENDAPAT.

    Sebetulnya , hal ini MEMANG tidak di dasari DASAR ILMIAH. Melainkan ' kebebasan hak asasi ' yang mengemuka.

    Jadi, dengan dasar HAK ASASI MANUSIA lah , VOTING tersebut di lakukan.

    Namun, kita pun juga jangan berburuk sangka dengan kaum apapun.

    Kita , di Indonesia, mengenal TOLERANSI.

    Nah, itulah penjabarannya.

    Jadi, jangan juga di ambil MASALAH dengan kaum kaum yang lain, yang mungkin bagi kita, terasa ANEH.

    Selama mereka juga mau mencintai NEGARAnya, berkorban buat NEGARA nya, ngapain kamu ributin ???

    Lain cerita kalau TERORIS.

    Betul ???

  • 1 decade ago

    ada teori yang bilang krn chromosom x928.

    aku sertakan website-nya di bawah ini.

    bacalah.

    USA juga belum sepenuhnya menyetujui hukum perkawinan sejenis, cuma 1 negara bagian saja Massachussetts. Canada, Belanda, Belgia, Spanyol... lengkapnya baca LIMA TAHUN PERKAWINAN SEJENIS DI BELANDA di link yang terakhir di bawah ini

    :)

    Source(s): Geneticists, using the clinician's research, have begun to look for the underlying biological determinants of heterosexuality, bisexuality, and homosexuality. In ten, twenty, or thirty years, we'll probably have figured it out. We've got the basics already. In early 2005 in the highly-respected biomedical journal Human Genetics, the team of Dr. Brian Mustanski of the University of Illinois at Chicago identified three chromosomal regions linked to sexual orientation in men: 7q36, 8p12, and 10q26. Which is very interesting on a biological level—and it's interesting on a political level in that with only a little more research we may be able to start testing fetuses in utero for their sexual orientation—but it's completely irrelevant to the questions of choice, pathology, distribution in populations, etc. No one questions that blue eyes occur more frequently in Caucasians than in Asians, but we don't know this by finding the genes for eye color; we know it by clinical observation of the distribution of eye color in people all over the world. No one questions that about 7.8% of all human beings are left-handed, but we don't get that information from genes—in fact, as of yet, we have no idea where the genes for handedness are—we get it, again, from clinical observation. The Catholic Church's position is the empirically correct position—the Catholic Church holds that homosexual orientation is an "innate instinct," not a choice or a "lifestyle," and the Church didn't need genes to come to that conclusion; it used empirical observation. We don't need to find the genes for sexual orientation to know that people don't "choose" to be heterosexual any more than we need to find genes for handedness to know that people don't "choose" to be right-handed. Among scientists, this is as obvious as the sky being blue. http://www.logcabin.org/lef/choice_white_paper.htm... http://66.102.9.104/search?q=cache:keDkFg1G6dAJ:14... http://www.mail-archive.com/berita@listserv.rnw.nl...
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.