What should you do when your President was caught cheating on you 935 times?

Impeach him, and then put him in Guantanamo for life! *sm*

Wow, I don't think this has been on here more than 50 OR 60 TIMES ALREADY!!

but, here is my response anyway.

Sorry, this is crap. The "Study group" is a front group funded by Bush-hater George Soros, and leaves out so many facts as to be laughable.

What you, the sufferers of BDS don't seem to get is that there is a difference between gathering and using information that proves to be faulty and outright lying.

Your very own precious Shrillary, on the floor of the Senate repeated the same "lies" about WMD, as did Kerry, and Kennedy, yet, they were telling the truth?

They had the same intel as everyone else.

And why did Ol' Billy Boy bomb Iraq? Just to show he could?

No.

He was acting on Intelligence that said, in very certain terms, that Saddam was working on WMD and Clinton acted accordingly.

Now, get over it already!

Nice try goofball...I wonder how many times the "center for integrity" went back and reviewed other presidents speaches...or did they just go into business to chase George Bush around? The funny thing is Bill Clinton said all the same things Bush said abour Iraq and he said them in the NINETIES...so suddenly he was telling the truth. I love how you post a Yahoo story to make your point. Nobody attacks Bush and conservatives like this dump!

Typical leftist liberal suffering from "Bush Derangement Syndrome"

I would do thirty seconds of due-dilligence and find out that the "study" was basically funded by George Soros...

He got his way, he doesn't care what the Americans think about him or is lies. It's almost over. Soon there will be a new president and hopefully the new president will have at least a shred of honesty and decency. For a change.

I want to see the background of all of those that made that lame study. WMDs were found and the rest were shipped to Syria. One of Saddam's generals admitted it.

Remember that you voted for people who said the same thing and that you didn't care:

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members .. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." - Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..." - Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."

- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do" Rep. - Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction." - Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"Americans need to really understand the gravity and legitimacy of what is happening with Saddam Hussein. He has been given every opportunity in the world to comply. The president does not control the schedule of UNSCOM. The president did not withdraw the UNSCOM inspectors. And the president did not, obviously, cut a deal with Saddam Hussein to do this at this moment. Saddam Hussein has not complied. Saddam Hussein is pursuing a program to build weapons of mass destruction." (Sen. John Kerry, Press Conference, 12/16/98)

"Why is Saddam Hussein pursuing weapons that most nations have agreed to limit or give up? Why is Saddam Hussein guilty of breaking his own cease-fire agreement with the international community? Why is Saddam Hussein attempting to develop nuclear weapons when most nations don’t even try, and responsible nations that have them attempt to limit their potential for disaster? Why did Saddam Hussein threaten and provoke? Why does he develop missiles that exceed allowable limits? Why did Saddam Hussein lie and deceive the inspection teams previously? Why did Saddam Hussein not account for all of the weapons of mass destruction which UNSCOM identified? Why is he seeking to develop unmanned airborne vehicles for delivery of biological agents? Does he do all of these things because he wants to live by international standards of behavior? Because he respects international law? Because he is a nice guy underneath it all and the world should trust him?" (Sen. John Kerry, Congressional Record, 10/9/02, p. S10171

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force-- if necessary-- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." - Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

I am not saying that he did not do it , but the supreme court said that it is legal to lie and slander your opponent candidates. so my point is unless we have first hand knowledge, how do we know the truth from lies?

Impeach.

do what many do, continue to ramble on about Clinton lying ONCE "under oath" about sex with an intern.