Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Irish famine?

Given the huge amount of food Britain imported from Ireland during the famine, why isn't it always referred to as a man-made famine the way the famine in the Ukraine in the 1930's is?

Update:

Yes, there was a biological agent, just as in Ukraine there was a drought, but in neither case would the natural cause have resulted people starving to death without the policies of the foreign government who saw the famine as a way of dealing with a troublesome nationality within their empire.

6 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    I guess we judge things differently based in who does it? In the US, most people like the English more than the Russians, so fewer people are willing to label the Irish famine for the genocide that it was, as shown by the following:

    Queen Victoria's economist, Nassau Senior, expressed his fear that existing policies "will not kill more than one million Irish in 1848 and that will scarcely be enough to do much good."

    When an eye-witness urged a stop to the genocide-in-progress, Trevelyan replied: "We must not complain of what we really want to obtain." Trevelyan insisted that all reports of starvation were exaggerated, until 1847. He then declared it ended and refused entry to the American food relief ship Sorciére. Thomas Carlyle; influential British essayist, wrote; "Ireland is like a half-starved rat that crosses the path of an elephant. What must the elephant do? Squelch it - by heavens - squelch it." "Total Annihilation;" suggested The Times leader of September 2, 1846; and in 1848 its editorialists crowed "A Celt will soon be as rare on the banks of the Shannon as the red man on the banks of Manhattan."

  • 4 years ago

    Fozzled provides an concepts-blowing answer; in line with probability i can summarize: The Irish had grow to be very, very based on potatoes via the early 1840s. there is one type that grew very effectively in eire and demanded minimum tending because it grew. the variety is universal by using fact the "lumper". the difficulty with the lumper is that it has an extremely extreme moisture content fabric. In eire's clearly damp climate, that became right into a prescription for disaster. In 1845 a fungus attacked the potato crop with superb ferocity. A healthful potato could be became right into a black, inedible mess in one day. And so based upon the lumper became into the inhabitants that 1000's of 1000's died while you evaluate that they had no longer something to consume. some Irish blamed the English. So strained have been family members between eire and England that it became into fairly basic for Irish individuals to believe the English had someway brought about the blight and then acted to make particular its unfavourable toll. The English did no longer do it, yet even if, the end results of the potato blight brought about via that fungus i discussed have been profound. there became right into a super wave of Irish immigration to united statesa. interior of right here years. It became into flow away or starve, definitely. it is so extraordinarily ironic at how united statesa. became into so richly blessed in the time of the sorrow that struck eire. The Irish have continually been among the main industrious and maximum inventive among us - and particular, i'm of Irish descent...yet I might desire to confess my ancestor got here to Virginia in 1740. nevertheless - Erin flow Bragh!

  • 1 decade ago

    Certainly the Crown and Parliament were callous to the plight of the Irish people but it really could not be seen as a tool of mass genocide.The potatoes were rotting in England and many other countries as well. What made it difficult in Ireland was that most of the population were hired farm laborers or tenant farmers. An extremely small percentage of the poulation owned the majority of the land.Tenent farmers relied on cash crops like grain to pay their taxes, tithes, and rent. The easily grown and abundant potato was for their own diets since they could afford to buy little else.The potato blight devastated the Irish crop due to "monoculture". In other words, everybody was growing the same variety of potato. There was not enough genetic diversity in the crop in order to find blight resistant strains.So the people's personal food supply rotted away. The grain belonged to the landlord who sold it to the highest bidder,in that case the grain merchants of England.

  • History of the famine was written by the British, perhaps? According to the referenced website below, "it was not simply a natural disaster. It was a product of social causes."

    This website goes on to say:

    "The Irish Potato Famine left as its legacy deep and lasting feelings of bitterness and distrust toward the British. Far from being a natural disaster, many Irish were convinced that the famine was a direct outgrowth of British colonial policies."

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 1 decade ago

    History---The farmers of the old sod were forced to farm the lands of British owners. The owners made them plant above ground crops and the Irish the below ground, hence potatoes. When the potatoes got the blight, the above ground crop was fine and the Brits could have cared less. They took what was their, and to heck with humanity.

  • 1 decade ago

    Because of the emphasis on the biological agent, the potato blight.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.