Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

joyce s asked in Politics & GovernmentElections · 1 decade ago

What is wrong with American voting for a woman over a mulatto and his not proud of USA wife?

Update:

Obama for the moment is catering to whiteshttp://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/blog/2007/12/bil...

9 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    Nothing, especially with all the misleading Obama does.

  • 1 decade ago

    The position is not "to give birth" or "racial purity czar", therefore the female or bi-racial components are IRRELEVANT. Only hysterical dems would use those as anything that proves who to vote for.

    Voting against an old, white guy is just as silly.

    Try looking at issues for a change that we can hope for.

  • 1 decade ago

    Why on earth would you vote for a presidential candidate based on their sex or ethnic background? Shouldn't we just be looking for the candidate with the best leadership qualities?

  • 1 decade ago

    I don't see anything wrong with it. Hilliary has my vote because I think she will do a better job not because she is female and he is biracial.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 1 decade ago

    Mulatto. I haven't heard that term since 1898.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    It's 2008...

    Catch up.

  • 1 decade ago

    Is there a question in there? Sounds rhetorical to me.

  • 1 decade ago

    Not a thing!

  • 1 decade ago

    The problem is is that "woman" is Hitlery.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.