PRO-CHOICERS: Why does the mother's "right" to choose come before the unborn child's right to live?

I was forced to have an abortion and it pisses me off when ignorant pro-lifers write me off as a killer without knowing my situation. I wanted my child and wanted to take responsibility but my selfish *** mother didn't care about what I wanted and made me get the abortion anyway.

You act like abortion is an easy thing...it isn't. You're killing your child plain and simple. Sure before 5 months, the fetus can't feel anything or think for that matter...but the guilt is the worst.

Women who've had abortions know they made a mistake and the guilt afterwards is our punishment. We don't need you ******* pro-lifers shoving our mistakes in our face and making us feel like less of a person. Get a ******* hobby because until you actually go through an abortion [which you never will because you're a MAN...I don't even know why you're even talking about something pertaining to pregnancy, which you'll never exprience], you have NO right to judge a woman who has had an abortion.

it incredibly is quite harsh. and that i do no longer think of an unborn newborn could be killed... I agree one hundred% with anabifigolo EDIT: You declare that we are defying the newborn a effortless human suitable, yet by using asserting this - by using forcing the beginning of a infant by using a woman - are not you, technically infringing in this lady's rights? the dazzling to have a decision. in many international locations, you're required to have a real looking reason with the intention to accomplish with an abortion. Abortion isn't performed without concept, or in simple terms performed because of the fact we could no longer care much less for a newborn... this is performed because of the fact each so often, possibly in a minority - it must be performed. In various circumstances, abortion is in simple terms performed because of the fact the girl has been raped, because of the fact of financial or medical motives. i will supply you an occasion extracted from what others have mentioned. a million. a woman famous out she will die in the technique of giving beginning to a newborn except she has an abortion. added greater, the newborn has a strategies undertaking and could in basic terms stay for minutes after the beginning. So by using no longer permitting this lady to have an abortion, you assert you may quite 2 lives be ended instead of one? How is this honest?

I am personally opposed to abortion, however, I don't believe anyone should ever be forced to go into a back alley for help. As far as I am concerned, when the woman permits herself to become impregnated, she forfeits her rights in favour of the child. There are too many people who would gladly accept an unwanted child just to conveniently kill it. No abortion should ever be performed without the full consent of the mother, the father of the unborn child, their doctor(s) and their minister(s). Abortions need to be a LOT more difficult to get than they are now.

Let's put it this way if a mother is already a lifeform and a foetus is celles with the capacity of becoming a lifeform and you value the life of the cells above the life of the lifeform then doesn't that make you a complete hypocrite.

until 10 weeks into the pregnancy...it is a parasitic relationship and there is no brain activity that shows awareness. To me that is not a baby...not by a long shot.

Further more....when the day comes that you can look in the mirror and pronounce yourself free of any and all sins....stop trying to tell others what they can and cannot do.

So stop trying to throw the proverbial stone

It's not a child. It is a mass of cells. Children can live outside the mom. Live with reality.

One thing that "pro-choicers" have in common is that they've already been born.

For the most militant pro-choicers, their four favorite words in the English language are "I," "me," "my," and "mine."

.

it is not the child's fault. less than 5% of abortions are performed because of incest/rape. the rest are performed because the mother was being careless and opted to kill the baby to escape her consequences.

Wow. Your argument is so original. I've never thought of it like that before.....*sigh*

ugh not this again. a zygote is NOT ALIVE.