Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Are incomprehensible rants valid?
If there is a rant, is it caused by environment or heredity and who are we to judge the quality of the rant? Is the average human above or below the level of the ranter? Is not ranting an equally viable method of communication to calm discussion? If a ranter is hard to follow, why should you blame the ranter and not the rantee? Isn't that a form of value judgement? And why should a ranter be limited to asking "a specific question"? Wouldn't four or even a dozen general questions, that are impossibly vague and hard-to-follow be more challenging to answer?
18 Answers
- Anonymous1 decade agoFavorite Answer
Ranters just need a pace to vent... we all know that no one will listen to them in real life... this is the only place where they can actually finish their rant and feel like they have an audience.
Sympathy for the ranters... they do not realize we don't read their rants here, either... lol
Source(s): By the way... if you were trying to rant, you're going to need to work on the incomprehensible part... lol (((((Laptop))))) - 1 decade ago
Well actually a rant is a valid form of communication. I see here that you are attempting to mock, but in all reality we know not of the emotional or ideological want of the ranter. Within relationships of any sort, even remote Internet communication, we all have calm moments, love, care and have need to be understood. However, in relationships we are often angry, hurt and annoyed, we wish to convey our emotions to others, to be heard, even if this takes the form of shouting or ranting. Have you ever argued with your partner, was it really comprehensible? Probably not, but there was a desire to convey the emotional needs and pain within yourself.
Little sweet Fireball's rant is valid, even if badly founded. 99% of questions here are leading, and the best answers chosen to those questions merely agree with the askers opinion.
Source(s): Pfft! Don't listen to me, I'm a psychologist. - 1 decade ago
In my estimation, the value of a piece of writing depends on its comprehensibility - unless it's poetry - so I'd have to say no.
If words mean anything, then there IS a proper usage; that's how you determine whether to blame the ranter or the rantee for the latter's incomprehension of the former.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
I'd say it's caused by environmental and hereditary factors...either the person is not educated or not intelligent enough to put together a rational and well-supported argument, so what they lack in meaningful content, they make up for with vehemence and wordiness.
They are interesting peeks into the mind of madness, but not enlightening, in general.
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
i agree... all of my rants are valid!!
at least they are valid in my head when I am going through them....later on when I am calm, cool, and collected they may seem crazy -- but that is not the point
my rant was valid at the point I made it..
not that I make a lot of crazy rants....
- 1 decade ago
This is yahoo answers not yahoo rant, and we the public should just mock the ranter.
Source(s): love the ranter hate the rant - Anonymous1 decade ago
good point...actually, rants are against community guidelines, but personally, I have better things to do than sit around reporting people all day, so I usually leave a random sort of response or ignore them completely.
- CosmodotLv 51 decade ago
I like the ones that are barely more than random words pulled together in fragmented sentences. I should start saving them just to have something to laugh about later...
- 1 decade ago
LOL. I love them ranting. They show themselves in all their horrible detail. The homosexual question was the best.