To all that voted for Mr.Bush....look up the NORTH AMERICAN UNION TREATY he signed with Canada and Mexico..?

It is real, Rhionnan, but it is a non-partisan issue, which I will explain below.

It is not "conspiracy theory". It is, to borrow Ron Paul's words, a "contest of ideologies". The contest is between those holding globalist ideology and those who support sovereignty and democracy.

I know you don't support Ron Paul, but I think you would find it helpful to hear how he described NAU during one of the presidential debates:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GE8FKPH8t0g&feature...

At present, those holding the globalist (global government) ideology are winning the contest.

(Why snopes.com continues to spread its disinformation that NAU is a myth is completely baffling. It certainly doesn't bode well for its honesty and reliability as an information source).

The government is hiding it in plain view, and many people are not noticing it.

They call it the "Security and Prosperity Partnership". The name itself was intended to mislead the public from the true nature of the program.

The SPP/NAU agenda starts with the Council on Foreign Relations and the corporate and banking elites behind it. To suggest that the CFR "influences" government is a gross under-statement. In reality, the CFR "dictates" foreign and trade policy to the government.

The CFR's reason for wanting NAU has absolutely nothing to do with making America safer or stronger, or improving the prosperity of the people.

Rather, it is about CORPORATE CONTROL of North America. They envisage two classes of people - elites and workers. Eventually, the middle class will continue to shrink until it is merely a small blip in history.

The media in this country keeps SPP/NAU information under wraps. Why? Because ownership of the national media has become consolidated into the hands of a very few corporate giants. The media giants are also members of the CFR and as such, they protect their own by keeping the people in the dark. You might find these links of interest:

The CFR controls American media

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JPlvdSQ6cAM

Rich Media, Poor Democracy

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MfRXaORNSK8

Big Media Interlocks with Corporate America

http://www.projectcensored.org/articles/story/big-...

Media Conglomerates, Mergers, Concentration of Ownership

http://www.globalissues.org/HumanRights/Media/Corp...

Graphical view - 25 years of media mergers

http://www.motherjones.com/news/feature/2007/03/an...

The Canadian media has been somewhat more open about it than our media, but still somewhat secretive.

Despite the media blackout, there is no excuse for people to be wilfully uninformed about the North American integration agenda. Information is available for anyone wishing to go read it.

You can to go to the "official" government web site:

http://www.spp.gov/

(I notice the spp.gov site has stopped being so generous with the information they make public, and suspect that is because people are now starting to pay attention to this issue)

and you can also see what the CFR is thinking at their web site

http://www.cfr.org/

(At CFR site, use the search box at the top right corner and search for these words

"north american union"

"north american integration"

"security and prosperity partnership"

Don't expect to find a single document that serves as "SMOKING GUN". Likely such documents do exist, but they certainly won't be made public.

There are other government web sites that I will link later in the message

If you would prefer to read the summaries of people who have already researched SPP/NAU, you might try these activism sites:

Stop the North American Union

http://www.conservativeusa.org/northamericanunion....

Stop the Security and Prosperity Partnership

http://stopspp.com/stopspp/index.php

Stop the North American Union

http://www.stopthenorthamericanunion.com/

******

Some of the states are attempting to fight NAU. See for example, the Arizona legislature.

"States keep up the Pressure against North American Integration"

http://www.thenewamerican.com/node/7748

QUOTE: "Last year the Arizona Senate passed a resolution asking Congress to withdraw the United States from the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America and block any activity that seeks to create a North American Union. In contrast, this year the Arizona House has taken the lead by passing a similar resolution on March 18 by a vote of 37 to 22. In another piece of good news, the Kansas House passed an excellent anti-NAU, anti-NAFTA Superhighway, anti-NAFTA resolution by a vote of 93 to 28 on April 4."

And

State of Arizona, House of Representatives

http://www.azleg.gov/FormatDocument.asp?inDoc=/leg...

If you search Google, I expect you will find a great deal of state-level protest coming out of Texas as well.

**************************************

HOW, you might ask, is this happening without the people hearing about it?

SPP doesn't consist of a single treaty as you would expect (ALTHOUGH IT SHOULD). The Bush Administration has found a novel way to avoid the processes called for by the Constitution for ratification of treaties. How … they just don't call them treaties … they call them "agreements"

How do they get away with it? Because the democratic Congress chooses to look the other way rather than honor its duty to uphold the Constitution and demand these agreements be subjected to the treaty approval process.

By way of example, as of February 14th, this year, our military and the Canadian military entered an agreement for cross-border co-operation for CIVIL MATTERS. Isn't our military adequate? Why do we need the Canadian military for CIVIL matters inside our country?

Our media blacked out that story, but it did get some coverage in the Canadian media:

Canada Free press: "Welcome to the North American Army

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/2040

Canada, U.S. agree to use each other's troops in civil emergencies.

http://www.canada.com/components/print.aspx?id=403...

National Post: "Canada, U.S. agree to share troops in civil emergencies"

http://www.nationalpost.com/news/canada/story.html...

EDIT. Curiously, since I last posted that National Post article about 3 weeks ago, they have removed that article. That may be a response to the growing public potest up there.

See also

North American Union Military Forges New Canadian Alliance

http://www.mainemediaresources.com/ffj_03120801b.h...

United States Northern Command

http://www.northcom.mil/News/2008/021408.html

Canadian National Defence and the Canadian Forces

http://www.dnd.ca/site/Community/mapleleaf/article...

In a nutshell, agreements are being made behind closed doors (without public knowledge, much less debate) that supercede US law on a vast range of issues, including security, industry, communication, schools, universities, food, agriculture, food supplements, energy and more.

The effect of these agreements is to nullify US administrative law in favor of North American "law".

It may sound somewhat utopian if one forgets that those behind the whole thing are ELITE CORPORATE INTERESTS. Thus, it is elite corporate interests that are shaping "laws" that we must abide by without an ounce of say in the matter. And they are certainly not intent on shaping those laws in a way that benefits the people. The "laws" are shaped to protect their profits and secure and retain CORPORATE CONTROL of North America.

So that should explain the "Security" and "Prosperity" aspects of the SPP. Security is not about terrorism. It is about keeping the corporate elite secure from the people. That is the reason behind the National ID Act. It is also a reasons for the constant stream of legislation aimed at eroding our civil liberties. The "Prosperity" part is, of course, about preserving the prosperity of multinational corporations and global elites.

Over time, NAU will eradicate the middle class and small business in America (and the whole continent). It will not happen in a big bang, of course. It will happen gradually, as we have witnessed with existing free trade agreements.

And you will never have a chance to vote on it.

And the problem is a non-partisan problem. The CFR and the corporate elites hijacked the government decades ago. That's why you don't see meaningful foreign policy and trade change when the controlling political party changes. On point:

1. Has the democratic Congress fulfilled their mandate to end the Iraq war?

2. Has either party honored the wishes of the people on immigration & the border security?

3. Who was President when NAFTA was signed?

The CFR chooses its candidates well before the election. The CFR-controlled media then brainwashes the people who to vote for. The road to the W.H. goes through the gates of the CFR. Candidates who want to play the game to win must become aligned with the CFR. Neither the media nor the candidates will admit this openly, of course.

Of course, once in office, a CFR-installed president will be compelled to play by CFR rules. Unfortunately, our top three candidates are all "CFR candidates" - Obama, Clinton & McCain. I am saddened to advise you on that because I sense your strong support for Clinton. (You may already be suspicious about this because of the "slip-ups" during the campaign re NAFTA (Obama) and Colombia (Clinton). At least McCain and the republicans are open about their position on free trade.)

The only way to

Old news,and the N. American Union will never happen. You want to know why? 300 million privately owned guns in the US. That's a pretty decent sized insurgency.

Wow,even Snopes says the North American Union Treaty is BS,how do you like that?

AD

That NAFTA agreement was pushed through and signed by Bill Clinton. If you want to bash Bush, at least get your facts straight. Silly liberal.

To all who want freedom for only Americans....

-read Gettysburg address

-look how women in Afghanistan are treated

Oh yeah. That evil conspiracy between North America contries about what to do when avian flu outbreaks occurs or a pandemic virus. Those evil monsters!

Read for yourself:

http://www.spp.gov/

Alert !!

Alert !!

Conspiracy Theory Nut Bag!

Bush Derangement Syndrome!

There is no North American Union Treaty, and Bush is a great leader and a good man.

She starting to YELL and SCREAM. I think she is beyond the point of no return. Somebody call the men in white coats to come and take her away. She needs medication quick, somebody please help.

where is it listed? and if you think this is the worst this country has been(point of no return) then you have never read a history book.

It is a Conspiracy theory made up in cyberspace...GET OVER IT....there are no Black Helicopters coming for you...if there were dont you think they would be smart enough to trace you thru this media..........sigh....so many gullible people believing this garbage...

Liberals are to my *** they both sold us out they are not people who are to be worship cough Obama this is one thing I disagree with him.

My pants ripped today while at work and I'm positive it was Bush's fault.

Get a grip.

Whatever. He's better than John Kerry.