Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Why do people still believe in the global warming hoax?
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/306/570...
Seems the sunspots are going away, so Gore better attach to that 'global cooling' name change very soon.... lol
Dorked, I have read an inconvenient lie(s) and I have evaluated all the science involved. Why is it that I need 'overwhelming' proof when global warming alarmists have shown ABSOLUTELY NONE????
Just to fill dorked in...
The film claims that melting snows on Mount Kilimanjaro evidence global warming. The Government's expert was forced to concede that this is not correct.
The film suggests that evidence from ice cores proves that rising CO2 causes temperature increases over 650,000 years. The Court found that the film was misleading: over that period the rises in CO2 lagged behind the temperature rises by 800-2000 years.
The film uses emotive images of Hurricane Katrina and suggests that this has been caused by global warming. The Government's expert had to accept that it was "not possible" to attribute one-off events to global warming.
The film shows the drying up of Lake Chad and claims that this was caused by global warming. The Government's expert had to accept that this was not the case.
The film claims that a study showed that polar bears had drowned due to disappearing arctic ice. It turned out that Mr Gore had misread the study: in fact four polar bears drowned and this was because of a particularly violent storm.
The film threatens that global warming could stop the Gulf Stream throwing Europe into an ice age: the Claimant's evidence was that this was a scientific impossibility.
The film blames global warming for species losses including coral reef bleaching. The Government could not find any evidence to support this claim.
The film suggests that the Greenland ice covering could melt causing sea levels to rise dangerously. The evidence is that Greenland will not melt for millennia.
The film suggests that the Antarctic ice covering is melting, the evidence was that it is in fact increasing.
The film suggests that sea levels could rise by 7m causing the displacement of millions of people. In fact the evidence is that sea levels are expected to rise by about 40cm over the next hundred years and that there is no such threat of massive migration.
The film claims that rising sea levels has caused the evacuation of certain Pacific islands to New Zealand. The Government are unable to substantiate this and the Court observed that this appears to be a false claim.
15 Answers
- Anonymous1 decade agoFavorite Answer
Because some people need a cause to believe in and that would be fine however the cause should be to inspire and lift us up. Certain people for some reason love the idea of bringing humanity down and blaming them for everything. Here is the sad thing, they whine about coal or oil, and spew out their hatred by touting the negatives of using these resources. They never talk about the positives these resources have given us. Ability to fly, to travel, to provide energy, food, and better health care. I was logger, all we ever heard from doomsayers is we are murders of trees, they never even understood how the forest is managed or what it would look like a few years after we cut. The open mined ones would realize they were misled., the believers it didn't matter they have no common sense and don't care about the other side of any environmental issue.
Cindy here is an example of these nuts, I emailed one of them accusing loggers of being criminals, and he said we caused the extinction of a species. So being open minded I wanted to find out what the logging practice was that caused this, and lo and behold. The species was not only living it was thriving because the resource department and the loggers were working together. When I emailed the individual, he rfused to believe it, these people have no business having any say on policy. They hurt the environment in the name of science they are truly misguided.
- antarcticiceLv 71 decade ago
Re: sunspots, not that a blog site is that accurate to start with, and I would wonder if they just cherry picking quite days as there have been a number of large sunspots already and we are only 5 months into the new cycle.
Below is the link to the SOHO site, the image I have linked shows the MDI Magnetogram which is the best one to see sunspots as the scale in the bottom right corner shows the smallest of these spots is the size of the Earth.
The second link is a small movie which also shows quite a bit of sunspot activity.
Source(s): http://sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov/data/synoptic/sunsp... http://sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov/data/LATEST/current... - 1 decade ago
Global warming is not a hoax at all. It's the government and media that lead us to believe it is. Why do you think the polar bear aren't on the endanrged lis? the thing is people are trying to make change because we need it. It's hurdles like the media preventing that.The media has a very unique way of showing whats important the people watching. For some reason they do not show the importance of global warming. Why do you think they say climate change instead of global warming? The reason for this censorship is because industries release more gas than thousands of cars on the road. this planet is getting to hot.
Venus is alot like how earth will be if we don't stop global warming
- BobLv 71 decade ago
Because it's proven scientific fact. The many proofs are way to long for a Yahoo answer, they're in the links.
This is science and what counts is the data.
"I wasn’t convinced by a person or any interest group—it was the data that got me. I was utterly convinced of this connection between the burning of fossil fuels and climate change. And I was convinced that if we didn’t do something about this, we would be in deep trouble.”
Vice Admiral Richard H. Truly, USN (Ret.)
Former NASA Administrator, Shuttle Astronaut
Here are two summaries of the mountain of peer reviewed data that convinced Admiral Truly and the vast majority of the scientific community, short and long.
http://www.globalwarmingart.com/wiki/Image:Climate...
http://ipcc-wg1.ucar.edu/wg1/wg1-report.html
summarized at:
http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/wg1/a...
There's a lot less controversy about this is the real world than there is on Yahoo answers:
http://www.worldpublicopinion.org/pipa/articles/ho...
And vastly less controversy in the scientific community than you might guess from the few skeptics talked about here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_opinion_on...
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/306/570...
EVERY major scientific organization has issued an official statement that this is real, and mostly caused by us. The National Academy of Sciences, the American Association for the Advancement of Science, the American Institute of Physics, the American Chemical Society, the American Geophysical Union, the American Meteorological Association, etc.
Good websites for more info:
http://www.nrdc.org/globalWarming/f101.asp
http://www.ucsusa.org/global_warming/science/
"climate science from climate scientists"
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- ?Lv 61 decade ago
As if anyone can prove it is/isnt a hoax? How would you go about proving it? Might as well prove God exists at the same time and that the Lochness monster still lives.
People always have and always will be blown around by every wind of doctrine or theory.
And Im guessing you havent watched Al Gores documentary on why he thinks its true. Without haveing reviewed the evidence, how can you possibly have an opinion of value at all?
Im not saying I agree one way or the other, but to claim it is/isnt true, you better have alot of hard evidence to back up your claims.
At least Al Gore did his homework, youve probably done jack squat.
- KenLv 51 decade ago
Why do you still believe in the conspiracy theory that hundreds and hundreds of climate scientists of different nationalities, different political backgrounds, different ages, different religious, etc. are all part of a huge hoax?
You can rant and assert your own brilliance till the cows come home, but until there is scientific evidence worthy of persuading the leading climate scientists of the world that global warming isn't real, the wise position to take would be that they are right and you are wrong.
- 1 decade ago
"Not believing" in climate change on a global scale is about as absurd as "not believing" in gravity. Most of the most credible scientific sources in the world (such as NAS and AAAS) support theories of global climate change, and advocate immediate action.
Now, I understand how that sounds, and most people would brush it off as liberal propaganda (i'm not that liberal btw) and claim that i don't know what i'm talking about. But if you don't support action against global warming, there is always this: Global warming is happening, most scientists admit this. But, there are more scientists who claim that global warming is a natural phenomenon and it is caused mainly by natural causes, *NOT* human activity such as carbon emissions from our cars.
Now THATS something to think about. This is the position that most Repulicans and Conservatives should take about this issue, because the other option: blind disbelief- is absurd.
- 1 decade ago
IT'S NOT A HOAX! THERE IS PROOF. HAVE YOU SEEN THE GLACIERS! our earth started melting 2,000 years ago. Us humans have just made it worst. Lake Ocaboji, Iowa, was a glacier, now it a great summer swimming pool. Penguins, Polar Bears, and other arctic species are dying. Don't you see the issue?!
- Anonymous1 decade ago
because we need SOME fictional enemy to unite against. what else are we gonna do with our time? cure things that are killing us today? of course not! if we did that then the hospitals wouldn't make as much money by keeping our relatives alive as vegetables.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
Perhaps because it is scientifically sound. Or because it has been essentially proven by the overwhelming amount of scientific evidence?