Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
What possible reason can there be for abortion?
Seriously- 99.9% of abortions occur because the mother specifically doesn't want to take responsibility for a choice SHE made. So yeah you got rape, but that's stupid, too. That's like killing a random kid off the street because someone mugged you (AND you aren't taking responsibility for your own choices). [If you can't accept that statement you seriously are just responding without thinking.] Ok, well what about if the woman's life is in danger? Wel lthen you'd think that saving the child would take precedence, jsut as in the example of the adult and the child in my previous question. So beyond those things, what possible reason is there to murder children? I mean, I could guarentee if anyone went into a school and bashed the brains of a six year old in and sucked them up into a vacuum tube for medical research they would be treated as insane murderous criminals.....what's the difference?
"Rape is a good reason." So if there are three people x, y, and z. Z should be killed because X raped Y. Great!
So then you would let the child fall
and save the full grown adult in the previous question?
Why does everyone make abortion to be about the woman. The life of another human being is at stake, but that's ok, let the mother kill it so she doesn't get made fun of in high school.
Puppylove (your name got cut off so i kinda assumed that's how it ended) that was an awesome response! That's what I'm looking for.
Being raped is not her choice no. The choice is to despite your personal pain, take the LIFE (hello? life or mental anguish?) of an INNOCENT in this situation and protect it. How is murder an answer for rape? But no, I'm the sick "fcuk".
Ok so taking out the bs comments about my brain development and such- most of you are saying that
A.) we are not accountable for our decisions
B.) A "human fetus" is in no way ever to be considered "human" (odd...)
Seriously, I'm not trying to be a dick, but how hard is it to see that someone's life being "ruined" is a far cry better than someone's life being ended.
Look at people in third world countries, they face greater hardships than if that teenager would have septuplets. Face it, that's just a bad reason.
So now its because there's a chance that the baby might die during pregnancy or birth...do you even see how pathetic that argument is?
Well, what if the woman gets hit by a car leaving the abortion clinic? I mean she could die at any moment too...goes both ways..
(that statistic isn't real, that's jsut me saying "majority" so you can freely ignor it)
Haha! attack me, whatever, doesn't change that most of these arguments for abortion don't hold water. And besides, I would gladly lay down my life for my wife and children.
Ok, so let me get this straight, killing asix year old would be ok if it saved a twelve year old? or did you mean that the difference in age affected this differently?
And also, although I do hold anti-feminist views, I have nothing but respect for women. But clearly you are taking something about life and death and making it into (once again) a men versus women issue. I guess if I had an operation and said the same thing you'd listen.
Another one- I'm not saying the doctor should gut the woman as she lays there on his table in her second week of pregnancy. You're right, that would be messed up. But knowing that she could die from the actual birth due to complications, should she choose to kill the child or continue living her life? Awful selfish, not that most people would choose the child, we live in a very selfish society, but what is the RIGHT thing to do?
reread that last edit need to fix a line:
"choose to kill the child or go ahead with the pregnancy and allow the child a chance at living its own life" instead of "kill the child or continue living her life"
I love the sperm and egg argument except one thing, a sperm will not develop into a human nor will an egg. That's why you gotta have sex in order to get pregnant...they gotta come together first....so that entire argument makes no sense
1. rape and incest
rape is overused and already discussed. incest is disgusting and is a choice (otherwise it would jsut be like rape) and incest children are not guarenteed to have birth defects.
2. when pregnancy is a health hazard
because killing the child isn't a hazard to anyone's health
3. when the one who's pregnant isn't much more than a baby herself(teens)
Ok, and what 150 years ago and the few millenia prior they would have several children already. Sorry.
4. socioeconomic reasons
murder for financial reasons. wow.
5. when a woman just doesn't want to be pregnant. her body her choice.
Ok, so when they go into her and kill the body that isn't hers, but rather that of a human baby that can't defend itself....but i guess her body her choice covers that...i guess any woman could kill anyone with that logic and say its her choice because its clearly her body
Laela yes! That's what i want...you people are sitting here attacking me as a person giving the same answers over and over not even reading what im writing. I want a real reason, something that, oh I don't know...makes sense?! Yes! If there were perhaps a disease where the only probable survivor would be the mother. That makes sense. Man, that was harder than pulling my own teeth out. Thanks, Laela =)
Thanks to all who posted actual contributions to my question and didn't just assume that because I favor letting a child live that I hate women, or that I'm some lunatic because I feel that a compeltely innocent child's life is more valuable than someone who has already lived at least part of their life. I'm not here to tell you that you're a "fcuk" because you think that killing children is a great thing. All I did was ask a question and about half (i didn't bother counting) were jsut flames on me, no wonder there's so much anger on here, you don't treat this as a means of information exchange, you treat it as a way to bash everyone else (for why? who knows..father wasn't around, mom didn't love you, etc, whatever). Once again thanks to the few of you who aren't "flamers" (haha, pun..anyway) and regardless of what side you were on actually took the time to write out a response to my question.
Ok, wow, I was going to leave here for the night but that last one was funny-
So what you are saying is that because of my gender I cannot make a decision to save a life? Or are you saying that only women are capable of making a decision regarding children? Or are you saying that if I were a woman, my moral views on murder would change?
Absolutely sexist. Seriously, I may not have to have a child, you're right, I'll never know the joy of being that close to a child that I helped make. You're absolutely right in that sense. But to say that because I don't have to go through with it that I shouldn't have an opinion is absurd. Maybe if you had a penis (because the uterus and penis are clearly what we think with) you'd be able to differentiate between the right to life and choosing to continue in what according to the posted statistics (thanks to whoever posted them, sorry I forgot the name of the user) is a life driven purely by the selfish desire to not have responsibility.
Well, once again thanks for the input. You've convinced me that certain cirumstances can arise to which abortion is the best option (and trust me not being able to go to prom isnt one of them, I'm sorry, get over it).
29 Answers
- DoneLv 61 decade agoFavorite Answer
Rape. Incest.
It's not stupid, dude. I have been raped and it's awful and the system treats you like it's your fault. You have no idea what it's like to think you are going to lose your life if you don't comply!
There is a huge difference, and you cannot compare the two. Yes, it shouldn't be used as a means of constant OOPS I'm pregnant issues, but even with every precaution taken things happen.
You can't make such a tough decision so black and white, especially since you've never been in a situation where your life has been threatened.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
You could apply this arguement ot birth control or the morning after pill. In fact, they are trying to, in certain states.
1.) A fetus is NOT the same as a child - or even a fetus after a certain time period into the pregnancy. the fetus doesn;t have awareness, or conciousness, or even a brain (and we take the plug out on people who are brain dead)The body will naturall abort pregnancies if it detects an abnormality, we are more capable of doing so. That's why there are time limits. Stop emotionalising the issue - it's a logical fallacy (constantly talking about rape is emotionalising for the other side. I'm being objective)
2.) Birth contol and the morning after pill attempt the same end result as abortion. They are not 100% - what about the people for whom they failed? It's still their choice.
3.) Why insist someone whos made a bad choice be left with the consequences? Doctors help smokers with lung cancer and drinkers with liver problems. Yes, I know this is a pregnancy not a disease, but as I say - at this point it is NOT a baby. It is the start of a baby - like the situation before you take the morning after pill. Or sex, before you use contraception. It is the possibility, which you are manipulating.
4.) In no way is this the same as killing random already born concious children. That is an incorrect comparison. Again, time limits, developmental stages, etc. The difference is the level of development the cells are at. They have potential to be a child - but so does evey egg. And every sperm, but masterbation is not murder.
- 1 decade ago
First of all, where did you get that percentage? Sounds like horseshit to me.
And how can rape not be an excuse? Imagine your wife or girlfriend getting raped and impregnated. Would you honestly want to raise the child? Would she? I mean, really, both of you would look at that kid in a way that no child should be seen: as a product of rape. And how would it be not taking responsibility for your own choices? I doubt she chose to be raped.
How would the child's life take precedence if it's unsure whether or not it can even be birthed. If the woman's five months through pregnancy and there are complications that require abortion, how can you not? The kid will not live, so why does the mother have to die?
The difference is that the six year-old is six years old, while the aborted is –6 months old.
And anyway, the last thing we need is more people on the planet, and especially a child the mother doesn't even want.
- 1 decade ago
There are many reasons for wanting an abortion, but there can be no justification. Your question has raised a lot of interest and obviously touched some very raw nerves. I believe that was not your intention. Am sorry for the person whose mate was raped when in school and became pregnant, I hope you both find healing from that rage. In the event of rape, yes, a woman should, if she so wishes, terminate the pregnancy; purely because of the circumstance of conception. In all other cases, abortion cannot be justified. You take an innocent life, whatever term you may refer to it with. People have sex, God creates children. If you don't want the possibility of a kid, for crying out loud, USE A CONDOM or abstain! You can't walk on the motorway and say you didn't expect to get run over, can you? So why should you have unprotected sex and claim you didn't choose to have a baby? Still think storks deliver babies, do you?
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- 1 decade ago
Oh, wonderful! The world without abortion.
You seem to live in your own little habitat with no understanding of the modus operandi of the real world.
Just for the sake of the argument- if the parent(s) do not wish to have a child, for whatever reason, but are forced to have it, what environment will the child grow up in? What will it become? Grateful it hadn't been aborted or on a killing spree because his mother never loved him?
As you are so concerned for the well-being of unborn children, perhaps you should set up a foster home? Because these kids, born against the wishes of the mother, will definitely end up on your doorstep, abandoned, or abused.
And regarding rape- how dare you judge what you have obviously no comprehension of? Get off your prodigal high horse.
Source(s): Common bloody sense - ShiversLv 61 decade ago
"1. rape and incest
rape is overused and already discussed. incest is disgusting and is a choice (otherwise it would jsut be like rape) and incest children are not guarenteed to have birth defects."
Being molested at a very young age by a male family member was not a choice for me. How could I have physically defended myself when I was a child? How could I have gone to the authorities when that man threatened to kill me if I ever told anyone? My mother wasn't there either, she had left & moved away.
Thankfully I never had to go through a pregnancy because of incest, but I find that you are lacking in empathy and common sense for suggesting that children have a choice as to whether they be molested or not.
Guess there must be some sick fcuks out there who thought I had a choice.
- La Bella VixenLv 41 decade ago
You are a random guy sitting behind that monitor typing up YOUR opnions. What makes you think that you are so important that I should carry my rapist's child because you said so? What makes you think that I should sacrifice my life because you said so? If you are a woman, then you are very free to keep the fetus of a rape or a fetus that might kill you. If you are a man, then stop dictating and imposing your opnions and don't have sex with a woman who believes that she cannot keep a pregnancy if she were to become pregnant.
- SharaLv 51 decade ago
There really is none. Most people realize that the baby can feel pain when they are killing it, but they'd rather not think about it.
In fact, they gave it a fancy name to further dehumanize it: "fetus". It's not a baby anymore, just a fetus :-(
It makes me sad to think of it. I know that some make the argument that the kid will grow up poor and miserable... I'm sorry, kids don't know what poor is! I grew up "poor" but I certainly wasn't miserable. And if you're going to use that argument, why not wait until the kid is 7 years old and then let them choose for THEMSELVES whether they want to continue living poor and miserable and if they do choose death, at LEAST kill them humanely and not violently like these poor children are dying in the womb! (Just as a note, I do not advocate euthenizing kids, that last statement was entirely sarcastic!)
I honestly think that abortion should be legal the same day that murder is legal. I don't know how anyone could ever commit such an atrocity!
- 1 decade ago
having sex doesn't mean you made a choice to have a baby, it means you had a lapse in judgement, so because of that you're gonna make a teenage girl throw her life away, that seems harsh
and a few week old fetus is not a human being, nowhere close, get a brain
your arguments have huge holes in them and most make no sense, they are just your blind angry uninformed rants, it must be embarrassing for you to lose so many arguments
why would you force a mother to die when it isn't probable the fetus will survive, YOU and YOUR LUNATIC IDEA would be MURDERING both of them (if you consider the fetus a life) because you want to take that choice away, please read a book that isn't the bible.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
You're wrong about the child taking precedence over the mother's life, and I'm pro-life. The life of the mother should come first.
It is true, of course, that most abortion that we discuss is convenience, drive-thru abortion for being irresponsible as you've said (and for living according to the liberal code that if something feels good you should do it, including ballooning up to 300 pounds from stuffing your face).
Source(s): http://nuurl.us/d3808