Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Is it proper for a convicted ex-policeman to hold an airside pass to work at a UK International Airport.?

This man admitted to me that he was convicted during his service as a policeman. Even though it was many years ago and the conviction is spent, is he still regarded as a fit and proper person to hold such a pass considering the security checks which are made by the authorities? It's Aberdeen FYI

Update:

Personally, I don't like the idea of working alongside a criminal, spent conviction or not. I don't think I'm being vindictive either, just trying to maintain a balance of what's right and wrong given that the security at airports is supposed to be second to none.

Update 2:

Ascoile; yes it was for theft.

Update 3:

I'm still not getting the yes or no answer I'm looking for. Is there somebody who actually knows how the rules stand as discussion and conjecture is all I seem to be getting. Thanks for your efforts all the same folks.

Update 4:

I can't decide on a best answer folks so I'll leave you to vote among yourselves. Thanks all the same

13 Answers

Relevance
  • Ian UK
    Lv 6
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    I see your point but don't agree with it myself.

    Yes I agree that theft is wrong, there's no doubt about that but would you think differently if this person wasn't an ex-Policeman?

    At the end of the day, he's only human and can make a silly mistake like anyone else.

    He would have to have declared this previous conviction when he applied for the job and it would have come up in his vetting checks if he didn't. I used to work in security and was vetted several times for different levels of authorisation for different departments and I knew people who were fired for not declaring things that were turned up in their vetting checks.

    Theft is a dishonesty offence, it doesn't necessarily make him a danger to the public.

    Source(s): UK Copper
  • 1 decade ago

    All felonies are not the same. If he were convicted of a violent crime, he most likely would not have a job at the airport. Maybe he was convicted of speeding too fast on the freeway. In some places if you're going more than 30 mph over the speed limit, that's an automatic ticket to jail.

    Maybe he was convicted of hurting someone in a car accident because he wasn't paying attention. Maybe he was convicted of car theft because he got into a tiff with his girlfriend and drove off in her car to cool off, and just to be spiteful, she had him charged with theft. Stranger things have happened.

    Maybe he was convicted of beating the snot out of a really bad guy. While police are NOT supposed to do that, could you really blame a person, cop or no, for beating the crap out of a child molester or rapist? Hard to say no to that one.

    Maybe he was convicted of clearing out his wife's bank account because he found out she was cheating on him.

    Maybe he was convicted of smoking weed.

    In short, there are a lot of different types of felonies, and generally speaking, violent felonies are what stick with you forever. A lot of the lighter felonies, like Class C felonies or below (D, E) only affect your for so many years. If this is the case, and it sounds like it is, he is NOT a danger to society, and you can't withhold a job from someone because something they did 20 years ago.

    If the authorities don't have a problem giving him a job, then you shouldn't have a problem with him having a job.

  • 1 decade ago

    He has the same rights as anyone else under The Rehabilitation of Offenders Act and obviously the type of offence could be irrelevant to his job he may have been convicted of smacking a paedophile for all we know.

  • flint
    Lv 7
    1 decade ago

    It depends what the conviction was for. The security at Exeter airport is a joke so why should anywhere else be any different

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    He obviously paid his debt to society---I believe that is what a conviction and being an ex-con is really all about. It is so very true though, that there are those that instead of assisting these people to become a honest members of society, they wish to continue to kick them more. Vindictive people everywheres, and I would not want to become one of those. I would assist the man in staying on the straight and narrow path.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Did he say what his conviction was for?If it is classed as spent it could not have been anything serious!Another point!He should have declared it on his employment application form!

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Yes, the conviction is spent. I am guessing it wasn't for terrorist or theft offences.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    I believe his Employers would have known all about that and would have considered the past in his life.

  • Sal*UK
    Lv 7
    1 decade ago

    I guess it depends on what his conviction was for!

  • Chris
    Lv 4
    1 decade ago

    no problem, i had an airside pass, criminal record wasn't a problem, all depends on what it was for, i suppose !

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.