Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Your Honest opinion..which is the better bassist?

Who's the better bassist in your opinion? Paul McCartney [The Beatles] or John Entwistle [The Who]? And WHY?

Both are really awesome so I can't choose. Thanks for answers =]

Update:

All of you are right :] They are both awesome players, but argh...i don't know :] I can't pick best answer here so ill put it to vote :D

Thank you all :D

16 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    paul becasue there are alot more beatles songs that are mellow and its quiet enough to really hear the base but the whos focal point is the guitar and or drums

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    John Entwistle, hands down. I love Paul and The Beatles, but Entwistle was a heluva lot better. He redefined bass playing. He turned the bass into an instrument that people notice, not just something make music sound more "full." Honestly, Paul wasn't that great of a bassist. He was certainly competent and technically skilled, but he didn't really do anything "new."

    So, even though The Beatles are the greatest band of all time, Entwistle owns Paul.

    However, Victor Wooten owns both of them. I think you'll appreciate this interpertation of "Norwegian Wood," Mrs. Paul McCartney :]

    http://youtube.com/watch?v=f9a4ThBNacY

  • 1 decade ago

    John Entwistle. Nuff said.

  • Entwistle is just the greatest bassist on earth besides James Jamerson and Jaco Pastorious. I am not saying McCartney is bad, he is just not on that level.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Tough call. Very different styles. I think John might have been better at cranking out really driving, powerful basslines to go along with Keith's madman drumming. When I think of John, I always think of The Real Me. One of the best bass performances in rock history.

    Paul on the other hand was subtly clever, he might not have had the fastest fingers or been the most experimental, but came up with some really good, solid inventive basslines. But I'd say overall I'd go with John

  • 1 decade ago

    i think entwistle is better strictly as a bassist...he just contributes so much to the who on that instrument, while mccartney's contributions to the beatles are more geared towards singing and songwriting, and this is reflected in his other projects and solo work

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    depends what kind of style of music you like, the beatles and the who are great....technically speaking john was a much better bassists but mccartney i believe is the BEST melodic bass player! just listen to the bass on 'something', it fits in beautifully with the song...so he was better at fitting in the bass into a song...thats what i think anyway :)

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Paul McCartney, definitely. Although the greatest bass in the world is Les Claypool.

  • 1 decade ago

    Paul is great, Entwistle is called "Thunderfingers" but the best is Phil Lesh!

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Of those two. John Entwistle.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.